Rather Than Just Complain, The Kings Have Some Ideas About
Aviation Security
The Ever-GA-Minded John King has
just fired off a note to ANN about their latest blog entries with
additional info about that happened to them last Saturday -- and
what they think needs to be done about the hazards they barely
escaped... at the point of a number of guns. As you may be aware,
in a story ANN broke over the weekend, both John and Martha King
(of King Schools fame, in case you live in a cave in Botswana and
haven't kept up), were detained at gunpoint by the Santa Barbara
Police department after a Federal agency errantly informed the PD
that the Cessna 172S they were flying in was stolen. It was
embarrassing and scary... but it could have been tragic and
bloody... hence the Kings' angst over what might be done to prevent
a repetition of such nonsense in the future.
John King notes that, "...the Chief of Police at Santa
Barbara has called to apologize for our 'short detainment.' I
explained that we neither asked for nor expected an apology, but I
was very appreciative. On the other hand, I explained, it
wasn’t the detainment that I objected to. It was that so many
guns were trained on us. In fact what bothered me most was not the
treatment I had received, but seeing Martha have guns being pointed
at her and seeing her being handcuffed.
Chief Sanchez explained that police are not trained to do
anything else when they detain an airplane but to treat it as a
high-risk traffic stop. The problem is that a high-risk traffic
stop involves aiming guns. I said that I understood that the
officers followed the procedure for a high-risk traffic stop to the
letter. My question is whether that procedure should have been
used."
The Kings have some solutions to the many concerns about
possible iterations of such actions in the future and have opined
that it is, "very rare when high-risk traffic stop procedures
are appropriate for aircraft. The aircraft are being intercepted
because they are in the IFR/flight-following system. The behavior
of these aircraft is very predictable. They have announced to the
world who they are, how to reach them, and when and where they are
going.
Once on the ground at an
airport, they will announce on the radio their destination on the
airport. They will taxi to the FBO, and if it is a 172, like we
were flying, they will usually be directed to a remote parking
spot. The pilot then will tie the airplane down, lock the doors,
and walk away from the airplane. The police can then simply walk up
to the occupants and talk to them without fear of their attempting
to flee. Once the airplane is parked, there is no way to go
anywhere. They don’t even have access to a car yet. The
suspects will have immobilized themselves.
If, on the other hand, the police set up an interception in
a remote area instead of at the FBO, any truly guilty suspect would
most likely spot the police cars, as we did, before they pulled
into the parking area, realize what is happening, and simply take
off from the taxiway before the interception took place. This
remote interception procedure only results in abusing the compliant
innocent while giving the guilty the opportunity to flee.
For an aircraft flying to a remote airport in the middle of
the night, it is possible more extreme measures would be required,
but it is unlikely that aircraft would have been using the
IFR/flight-following system and be reported. So this situation is
unlikely to come up."
Among the suggestions the Kings have made are four ideas that
really do merit consideration... and let's face it, where the Kings
are concerned, they have to come from the heart...

1.The FAA should not re-assign numbers of stolen aircraft
unless the system is changed to protect the users of the aircraft
the number is re-assigned to. The registration number on our
aircraft, N50545, had been previously assigned to a 1968 C150 that
was stolen. According to the owner, the C150 was never found, but
the FAA re-assigned the number to our C172 anyway.
2.El Paso Intelligence Center (EPIC) should check the FAA
database before notifying agencies that a stolen aircraft in the
IFR system is inbound. Plus, the notifications should distinguish
between suspected drug smugglers, terrorists and aircraft thieves.
It would have taken only about a minute on www.FAA.gov for them to
search the registration number in question to learn that number had
been re-assigned to a different aircraft.

3.There needs to be a system for correcting the stolen
aircraft database and better coordination between agencies. The
aircraft we were flying had been intercepted 18 months ago for the
same reason, on a trip by a Cessna employee between the Cessna
factory and Wichita, KS. Yet nobody bothered to remove the aircraft
from the stolen aircraft list.
4.Police departments should be given Standard Operating
Procedures and training regarding meeting suspicious aircraft.
Aircraft are different from cars. Plus, police departments should
take the 60 seconds or so required to determine that the suspect
aircraft has not had the registration number re-assigned and is the
correct make and model.
Their final words are chilling, however, in that they admit to
having continuing concerns about what happened to them, even though
they emerged (more or less) unscathed... "One thing that still
bothers me about this case is that the Santa Barbara Police
Department is still treating this case as if it were no big deal. I
guess it isn’t a big deal if you are on the aiming end of the
gun. And I have to admit that nobody was hurt and we and the police
returned to our homes that night. Their reports to the press
characterize us as” laughing afterwards” and
“completely understanding”. The truth is that we were
completely cooperative, and what we understood is that it is never
wise to argue with a law enforcement officer. There will always be
plenty of time for argument later on if you survive the
incident.

We were not insulted or offended personally. We just feel
that drawing guns on people is dangerous business—not to be
done unless it is absolutely necessary. And it will continue to
happen to other pilots unless the system is changed."
ANN E-I-C Note: Amen...