Who Knows What's Going on With Starliner? | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-05.05.25

Airborne-NextGen-05.06.25

AirborneUnlimited-05.07.25

Airborne-Unlimited-05.01.25

AirborneUnlimited-05.02.25

Fri, Aug 09, 2024

Who Knows What's Going on With Starliner?

A "Three Hour Tour" Stretches Into Months for Gilligan & Co - Or, Wilmore & Williams

After about two months of delays, space enthusiasts have begun wondering just how functional the Boeing Starliner is, after apparently stranding Astronauts Butch Wilmore and Suni Williams on the ISS.

Initially, the problematic Starliner was slated for a quick 'out-n-back' mission that would serve as its official entry into crewed launches, taking Wilmore and Williams to the ISS and back. On its outbound leg, Starliner suffered a number of thruster malfunctions, which Boeing had downplayed as an issue ahead of the return flight. At first, the company said it had merely postponed the launch in order to study elements of the system that would later be lost during the reentry process, but now, they aren't so sure, having been unable to replicate and identify the root cause of the thruster failure.

As space aficionados ticked the days off their calendars, the story seemed less and less a case of simple mechanical or software error and more one of corporate obfuscation. Grumbling abounds on forums and social media, as the original "three hour tour" planned for Starliner stretches indefinitely into the future. Boeing hasn't had a great track record of quality-first, detail-oriented, attentive manufacturing in its civil aviation side as of late, and its continued foibles against the newcomer SpaceX has really depleted its brand cachet. That leaves the peanut gallery to believe it's not all that unlikely that the firm is trying to keep quiet about the depth of Starliner's issues, particularly if any problems could be easily solved with a quick and dirty software update.

Some well-placed journalists have said that NASA, famously conservative about safety when it comes to crewed flights, have put off the detachment of Starliner from the ISS. Reportedly, the thruster issues could, in the right sequence of failure, result in a collision with the ISS soon after undocking, or leave the capsule to uncontrollably flail during its atmospheric reentry. An entire headache of software has come to light, thanks to Eric Berger's digging, which revealed, in typical Boeing fashion, an uncharacteristic level of engineering apathy:

"Three separate, well-placed sources have confirmed to Ars Technica that the current flight software on board Starliner cannot perform an automated undocking from the space station and entry into Earth’s atmosphere," said Berger. "At first blush, this seems absurd. After all, Boeing’s Orbital Flight Test 2 mission in May 2022 was a fully automated test of the Starliner vehicle. During this mission, the spacecraft flew up to the space station without crew on board and then returned to Earth six days later. Although the 2022 flight test was completed by a different Starliner vehicle, it clearly demonstrated the ability of the program's flight software to autonomously dock and return to Earth. Boeing did not respond to a media query about why this capability was removed for the crew flight test."

By now, it's looking more and more likely that Wilmore and Williams will have to come back home aboard ol' reliable, the SpaceX Crew Dragon.

FMI: www.nasa.gov

 


Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (05.06.25)

Aero Linx: International Federation of Airworthiness (IFA) We aim to be the most internationally respected independent authority on the subject of Airworthiness. IFA uniquely combi>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.06.25): Ultrahigh Frequency (UHF)

Ultrahigh Frequency (UHF) The frequency band between 300 and 3,000 MHz. The bank of radio frequencies used for military air/ground voice communications. In some instances this may >[...]

ANN FAQ: Q&A 101

A Few Questions AND Answers To Help You Get MORE Out of ANN! 1) I forgot my password. How do I find it? 1) Easy... click here and give us your e-mail address--we'll send it to you >[...]

Classic Aero-TV: Virtual Reality Painting--PPG Leverages Technology for Training

From 2019 (YouTube Edition): Learning To Paint Without Getting Any On Your Hands PPG's Aerospace Coatings Academy is a tool designed to teach everything one needs to know about all>[...]

Airborne 05.02.25: Joby Crewed Milestone, Diamond Club, Canadian Pilot Insurance

Also: Sustainable Aircraft Test Put Aside, More Falcon 9 Ops, Wyoming ANG Rescue, Oreo Cookie Into Orbit Joby Aviation has reason to celebrate, recently completing its first full t>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC