FAA Investigates Close Call Over MEM | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.21.25

Airborne-NextGen-04.22.25

AirborneUnlimited-04.23.25

Airborne-FltTraining-04.24.25

AirborneUnlimited-04.25.25

Sat, Mar 01, 2008

FAA Investigates Close Call Over MEM

Confusion Over FedEx Flight Numbers Led To Incursion

It's one of the most common areas of potential confusion in the cockpit -- radio transmissions and ATC communications involving two aircraft with similar-sounding tail- or- flight-numbers. Such was case last week at Memphis International Airport, and it led to a close call involving two FedEx aircraft.

The Associated Press reports two FedEx DC-10s -- departing at around the same time from MEM, on parallel runways -- came within 200 feet vertically and 3/4 of a mile horizontally after takeoff February 21, after one of the jets followed instructions intended for the second aircraft.

The flights involved were FedEx 527, and FedEx 257. "The controller didn't recognize the error on read-back," FAA spokeswoman Kathleen Bergen said.

The resulting airspace violation has been listed as a Category A incursion, considered the most serious by the FAA. Large aircraft over Memphis are supposed to keep a distance of at least 1,000 feet vertically and three miles horizontally.

"We had a pilot read-back error, which caused us to have an operational error," Bill Wertz, the FAA's tower supervisor at MEM, told the Memphis Commercial Appeal. "We did our investigation and are providing training for the controller. FedEx has assured us that they are also taking appropriate steps."

As has been the case in past incidents nationwide, the local representative of the National Air Traffic Controllers Association blamed the incident -- and other recent mistakes by controllers at MEM -- on short-staffing, forced overtime, and fatigue.

"Those airplanes were extremely close together and that's just seconds away from the two of them hitting," said Ron Carpenter, NATCA's Facility Representative at Memphis Center.

Bergen disagreed with that assertion. "We have never found fatigue to be an issue in any of the errors that have occurred at Memphis," she said.

FMI: www.faa.gov, www.natca.org, www.fedex.com

Advertisement

More News

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (04.28.25)

“While legendary World War II aircraft such as the Corsair and P-51 Mustang still were widely flown at the start of the Korean War in 1950, a new age of jets rapidly came to >[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.28.25): Decision Altitude (DA)

Decision Altitude (DA) A specified altitude (mean sea level (MSL)) on an instrument approach procedure (ILS, GLS, vertically guided RNAV) at which the pilot must decide whether to >[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.28.25)

Aero Linx: National Aviation Safety Foundation (NASF) The National Aviation Safety Foundation is a support group whose objective is to enhance aviation safety through educational p>[...]

Airborne-Flight Training 04.24.25: GA Refocused, Seminole/Epic, WestJet v TFWP

Also: Cal Poly Aviation Club, $$un Country, Arkansas Aviation Academy, Teamsters Local 2118 In response to two recent general aviation accidents that made national headlines, more >[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (04.29.25)

“The FAA is tasked with ensuring our skies are safe, and they do a great job at it, but there is something about the system that is holding up the medical process. Obviously,>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC