FAA Facility Consolidation Plan Opposed In Pueblo | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-06.10.24

Airborne-NextGen-06.11.24

Airborne-Unlimited-06.12.24 Airborne-FltTraining-06.13.24

Airborne-Unlimited-06.14.24

Fri, Dec 01, 2006

FAA Facility Consolidation Plan Opposed In Pueblo

Lawmakers Want To Keep Approach Facility There Open

Colorado congressmen are opposing an FAA plan to close Pueblo's approach control facility and hand off control of air traffic to facilities in Colorado Springs or Denver.

The FAA announced the proposal in September, but has yet to make a final decision. The aviation agency is looking at consolidating operations in 170 facilities nationwide to save money.

Representative John Salazar says it's a safety issue. In a statement released Wednesday he said, "I have flown into the Pueblo airport many times and am concerned about the potential impact on air traffic safety if the proposal is approved."

A new pilot screening program awarded to Doss Aviation and set to take off at Pueblo is adding a wrinkle to the debate. Pueblo city officials say traffic handled by controllers will nearly double. The FAA says it can handle the increased traffic, even if Pueblo's approach control facility is closed.

Senators Ken Salazar and Wayne Allard have both contacted the FAA voicing their dissent to the plan. They say they'll fight against closing Pueblo's facility because they believe the increased traffic from the flight screening program will affect safety.

A Salazar spokesman told the Pueblo Chieftain, "Senator Salazar intends to keep that (approach control) service in Pueblo."

The National Air Traffic Controllers Association representative in Pueblo, Bryan Sanford, says Colorado Springs and Denver are already understaffed, and moving Pueblo's controllers to those facilities wouldn't save the FAA money.

As for Doss Aviation, company spokesman Paul Walker says, "We've taken a hands-off approach to this situation. As long as they can provide the service we need, we're willing to let the FAA determine where they want to locate the controllers."

FMI: www.faa.gov

Advertisement

More News

ANNouncement: Now Accepting Applications For Oshkosh 2024 Stringers!!!

An Amazing Experience Awaits The Chosen Few... Oshkosh, to us, seems the perfect place to get started on watching aviation recover the past couple of years... and so ANN is putting>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (06.13.24)

“NBAA has a tremendous responsibility to the business aviation industry, and we are constantly collaborating with them. Our flight departments, professionals and aircraft own>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (06.13.24): Dead Reckoning

Dead Reckoning Dead reckoning, as applied to flying, is the navigation of an airplane solely by means of computations based on airspeed, course, heading, wind direction, and speed,>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (06.13.24)

Aero Linx: Vertical Aviation Safety Team (VAST) We are a public–private initiative to enhance worldwide flight operations safety in all segments of the vertical flight indust>[...]

ANN FAQ: How Do I Become A News Spy?

We're Everywhere... Thanks To You! Even with the vast resources and incredibly far-reaching scope of the Aero-News Network, every now and then a story that should be reported on sl>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC