Airport Neighbors: Don't Extend The Runway | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-11.17.25

AirborneNextGen-
11.11.25

Airborne-Unlimited-11.12.25

Airborne-FltTraining-11.13.25

AirborneUnlimited-11.14.25

LIVE MOSAIC Town Hall (Archived): www.airborne-live.net

Fri, Nov 19, 2004

Airport Neighbors: Don't Extend The Runway

Philadelphia International Gets An Earful About Noise

If you ask a lot of people around West Deptford Township (NJ), they don't want Philadelphia International's Runway 17-35 to be extended 400 feet in their direction -- they don't want the runway at all.

About 60 people, many of them township residents, showed up at a public hearing conducted by the FAA Tuesday night, opposed to the runway extension project. Specifically, two of the three alternatives under consideration would extend the runway south, toward the small New Jersey town. Residents say that would mean more pollution and more noise.

Steve Drummond not only doesn't want to see the runway extended toward his home in West Deptford. "I'd like to see 17-35 shut down entirely," he said. He was quoted in the Gloucester County Times.

Another resident hoping to add his displeasure to the testimony being gathered for the project's environmental impact statement was Judy Shillingford. "When the planes go over my house, it's deafening," she said. "I can't imagine what the quality of life will be in my neighborhood if this goes through."

Residents like Drummond and Shillingford have until the first of December to tell the FAA what they think about the idea of extending 17-35. The City of Philadelphia, which runs the airport, says it needs to extend the runway because of congestion.

Ironically, the FAA says not extending the runway could be even worse for the angry airport neighbors. They could see a "continued increase in aircraft noise from growth in airport operations," the report stated.

The federal EIS isn't the last stop for the proposed project. It still has to pass muster with the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection, US Army Corps of Engineers and the US Environmental Protection Agency.

FMI: www.phl.org

Advertisement

More News

Classic Aero-TV: Extra Aircraft Announces the Extra 330SX

From 2023 (YouTube Edition): An Even Faster Rolling Extra! Jim Campbell joined General Manager of Extra Aircraft Duncan Koerbel at AirVenture 2023 to talk about what’s up and>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (11.15.25)

“Receiving our Permit to Fly and starting Phase 4 marks a defining moment for Vertical Aerospace. Our team has spent months verifying every core system under close regulatory>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (11.15.25): Middle Marker

Middle Marker A marker beacon that defines a point along the glideslope of an ILS normally located at or near the point of decision height (ILS Category I). It is keyed to transmit>[...]

NTSB Final Report: Lancair 320

The Experienced Pilot Chose To Operate In Instrument Meteorological Conditions Without An Instrument Flight Rules Clearance Analysis: The airplane was operated on a personal cross->[...]

Airborne 11.14.25: Last DC-8 Retires, Boeing Recovery, Teeny Trig TXP

Also: ATI Strike Prep, Spirit Still Troubled, New CubCrafters Dealership, A-29 Super Tucano Samaritan’s Purse is officially moving its historic Douglas DC-8 cargo jet into re>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC