FAA Gives United Airlines the All-Clear | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-05.05.25

Airborne-NextGen-05.06.25

AirborneUnlimited-05.07.25

Airborne-Unlimited-05.01.25

AirborneUnlimited-05.02.25

Wed, Oct 09, 2024

FAA Gives United Airlines the All-Clear

Agency Ends Period of Enhanced Oversight

After nearly 7 months, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has put an end to its period of increased oversight on United Airlines. The agency found no significant red flags in its safety review.

The FAA opened a review of United Airlines in March following a chain of concerning incidents. In February, a faulty actuator caused rudder pedals to jam on one of the carrier’s Boeing 737s. Then, on March 15, a United Boeing 737-800 flight shed an external panel while traveling from San Francisco to Rogue Valley. Other slips include a hydraulic failure, runway excursion, and three separate instances of tires falling off after departure.

Despite these incidents, the FAA reported that "the review did not identify any significant safety issues” and that the airline's precautionary efforts were "really strong".

The airline was subject to several indirect restrictions during this period. FAA Administrator Mike Whitaker commented that United was allowed to accept delivery of new aircraft, but required the presence of agency officials while conducting final inspections of replacement aircraft. Despite this, the airline deferred delivery of nine Boeing 737 MAX 9 aircraft.

United also delayed the opening of two new international routes. The airline required certifications from the FAA that were paused once the safety review began.

These restrictions did not hinder United’s travel capacity, but may have increased operating costs by forcing it to keep an older fleet in service for longer than planned.

The FAA opened a similar review of Southwest Airlines in July. This called out several near-miss incidents involving unusually low approaches to landing. Whitaker recently commented that the Southwest review "is a bit more narrow" than that of United.

FMI: www.united.com

Advertisement

More News

ANN FAQ: Follow Us On Instagram!

Get The Latest in Aviation News NOW on Instagram Are you on Instagram yet? It's been around for a few years, quietly picking up traction mostly thanks to everybody's new obsession >[...]

Classic Aero-TV: Innovation By Avilution – ‘Pilots Care About Results’

From 2019 (YouTube Edition): Panel Possibilities Range From LSA To eVTOL Aircraft For the most part, pilots care about the information being presented to them rather than how that >[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (05.09.25)

"Flight testing demonstrated significant performance improvements with the Pathfinder-equipped Husky. Compared to the baseline Type Certificated 2-blade Hartzell propeller, the 3-b>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.09.25): Estimated (EST)

Estimated (EST) When used in NOTAMs “EST” is a contraction that is used by the issuing authority only when the condition is expected to return to service prior to the e>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (05.09.25)

Aero Linx: Coalition of Airline Pilots Associations (CAPA) The Coalition of Airline Pilots Associations (CAPA) is the world’s largest pilot trade association representing ove>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC