FAA Gives United Airlines the All-Clear | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-05.05.25

Airborne-NextGen-05.06.25

AirborneUnlimited-05.07.25

Airborne-Unlimited-05.01.25

AirborneUnlimited-05.02.25

Wed, Oct 09, 2024

FAA Gives United Airlines the All-Clear

Agency Ends Period of Enhanced Oversight

After nearly 7 months, the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has put an end to its period of increased oversight on United Airlines. The agency found no significant red flags in its safety review.

The FAA opened a review of United Airlines in March following a chain of concerning incidents. In February, a faulty actuator caused rudder pedals to jam on one of the carrier’s Boeing 737s. Then, on March 15, a United Boeing 737-800 flight shed an external panel while traveling from San Francisco to Rogue Valley. Other slips include a hydraulic failure, runway excursion, and three separate instances of tires falling off after departure.

Despite these incidents, the FAA reported that "the review did not identify any significant safety issues” and that the airline's precautionary efforts were "really strong".

The airline was subject to several indirect restrictions during this period. FAA Administrator Mike Whitaker commented that United was allowed to accept delivery of new aircraft, but required the presence of agency officials while conducting final inspections of replacement aircraft. Despite this, the airline deferred delivery of nine Boeing 737 MAX 9 aircraft.

United also delayed the opening of two new international routes. The airline required certifications from the FAA that were paused once the safety review began.

These restrictions did not hinder United’s travel capacity, but may have increased operating costs by forcing it to keep an older fleet in service for longer than planned.

The FAA opened a similar review of Southwest Airlines in July. This called out several near-miss incidents involving unusually low approaches to landing. Whitaker recently commented that the Southwest review "is a bit more narrow" than that of United.

FMI: www.united.com

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.05.25): Circle To Runway (Runway Number)

Circle To Runway (Runway Number) Used by ATC to inform the pilot that he/she must circle to land because the runway in use is other than the runway aligned with the instrument appr>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (05.05.25)

Aero Linx: National Aviation Safety Foundation (NASF) The National Aviation Safety Foundation is a support group whose objective is to enhance aviation safety through educational p>[...]

NTSB Prelim: De Havilland DHC-1

At Altitude Of About 250-300 Ft Agl, The Airplane Experienced A Total Loss Of Engine Power On November 6, 2024, at 1600 central standard time, a De Havilland DHC-1, N420TD, was inv>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: The Boeing Dreamliner -- Historic First Flight Coverage

From 2009 (YouTube Edition): Three Hour Flight Was 'Flawless' -- At Least, Until Mother Nature Intervened For anyone who loves the aviation business, this was a VERY good day. Afte>[...]

Airborne-NextGen 05.06.25: AF Uncrewed Fighters, Drones v Planes, Joby Crew Test

Also: AMA Names Tyler Dobbs, More Falcon 9 Ops, Firefly Launch Unsuccessful, Autonomous F-16s The Air Force has begun ground testing a future uncrewed jet design in a milestone tow>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC