Governor's Plane Sparks Partisan Battle | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-11.17.25

AirborneNextGen-
11.11.25

Airborne-Unlimited-11.12.25

Airborne-FltTraining-11.13.25

AirborneUnlimited-11.14.25

LIVE MOSAIC Town Hall (Archived): www.airborne-live.net

Thu, Aug 19, 2004

Governor's Plane Sparks Partisan Battle

New Mexico's Republicans Want A Delay, AG Agrees

Believe it or not, they're still fighting in New Mexico over the plane Governor Bill Richardson wants to buy.

As ANN reported back in June, the Democratic governor wants to buy a $4 million turboprop to replace the state's 1966 Aero-Commander. The proposal has done the bump and grind through the state's legislative process, only to end up at the center of partisan politics.

"It's a safety concern. It's a cost issue. It's something that needs to happen," said New Mexico Transportation Secretary Rhonda Faught. It's the same thing she's been saying for months. But now, Republicans in the legislature say the Richardson administration is pulling a classic bait-and-switch. It seems the Aero-Commander was fitted with a camera to monitor the progress of road construction. While the camera is being installed in another, older aircraft, Republicans are crying foul because the funds for replacing the plane are dedicated to roads.

Ironically, Attorney General Patricia Madrid -- a Democrat -- has ruled the money for a new aircraft should go "for the construction and maintenance of roads and bridges -- not to buy a passenger plane to fly government officials around."

But that's exactly what the state's RFP says: "The aircraft's primary mission will involve the transportation of government officials within, but not limited to, the State of New Mexico."

Madrid says that's downright illegal. Faught disagrees. If the two can't resolve their differences, the whole thing could end up in court.

FMI: www.nmshtd.state.nm.us

Advertisement

More News

Classic Aero-TV: Extra Aircraft Announces the Extra 330SX

From 2023 (YouTube Edition): An Even Faster Rolling Extra! Jim Campbell joined General Manager of Extra Aircraft Duncan Koerbel at AirVenture 2023 to talk about what’s up and>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (11.15.25)

“Receiving our Permit to Fly and starting Phase 4 marks a defining moment for Vertical Aerospace. Our team has spent months verifying every core system under close regulatory>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (11.15.25): Middle Marker

Middle Marker A marker beacon that defines a point along the glideslope of an ILS normally located at or near the point of decision height (ILS Category I). It is keyed to transmit>[...]

NTSB Final Report: Lancair 320

The Experienced Pilot Chose To Operate In Instrument Meteorological Conditions Without An Instrument Flight Rules Clearance Analysis: The airplane was operated on a personal cross->[...]

Airborne 11.14.25: Last DC-8 Retires, Boeing Recovery, Teeny Trig TXP

Also: ATI Strike Prep, Spirit Still Troubled, New CubCrafters Dealership, A-29 Super Tucano Samaritan’s Purse is officially moving its historic Douglas DC-8 cargo jet into re>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC