Sikorsky: Off-Balance Black Hawk Tail Rotor Would Be A 'Minor' Issue | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-05.05.25

Airborne-NextGen-05.06.25

AirborneUnlimited-05.07.25

Airborne-Unlimited-05.01.25

AirborneUnlimited-05.02.25

Mon, Jan 09, 2017

Sikorsky: Off-Balance Black Hawk Tail Rotor Would Be A 'Minor' Issue

Company Responds To Army Report Stemming From 2015 Accident

In its investigation of an accident involving a UH-60 Black Hawk helicopter in November, 2015, the U.S. Army reported that the aircraft was "not airworthy" from November 10 until the accident occurred on November 15 because "the tail rotor had been out of balance (greater than 0.7 inches per second)"

But Sikorsky, which manufactures the helicopter, has a different view. The Killeen Daily Herald reports that the company contends that an off-balance tail rotor is "a very minor discrepancy that would not have an impact on the flight characteristics of the aircraft."

Four soldiers from Fort Hood were fatally injured when the helicopter went down.

The U.S. Army report also states that the aircraft did not experience a mechanical failure, and a visual inspection of the helo after the accident "revealed no pre-existing defects or anomalies that would have contributed to this accident.”

Sikorsky spokesman Paul Jackson said that the company was not part of the investigation and has no knowledge of the Army's report. He said he was providing the information about the tail rotor for informational purposes only.

Jackson said that his experts also contend that an unbalanced tail rotor would not cause a flight path stabilization warning to activate. “If there is a failure in the Flight Path Stabilization (FPS) System, the Master Caution and FPS caution/warning lights would illuminate, but there is no audible warning,” he said. “We cannot comment on any impact the warning lights may have had on the pilot flying the aircraft.”

Jackson said that the UH-60 can be manually flown without an operational FPS system.

The First Army Division West released a separate report in September that listed pilot error as the cause of the accident. The Army report in December redacted that information.

(Image from file)

FMI: www.army.mil, www.sikorsky.com

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.07.25): Terminal Radar Service Area

Terminal Radar Service Area Airspace surrounding designated airports wherein ATC provides radar vectoring, sequencing, and separation on a full-time basis for all IFR and participa>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (05.07.25)

Aero Linx: Utah Back Country Pilots Association (UBCP) Through the sharing experiences, the UBCP has built upon a foundation of safe operating practices in some of the most challen>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: Anousheh Ansari -- The Woman Behind The Prize

From 2010 (YouTube Edition): Imagine... Be The Change... Inspire FROM 2010: One of the more unusual phone calls I have ever received occurred a few years ago... from Anousheh Ansar>[...]

NTSB Prelim: Bell 206B

(Pilot) Felt A Shudder And Heard The Engine Sounding Differently, Followed By The Engine Chip Detector Light On April 14, 2025, about 1800 Pacific daylight time, a Bell 206B, N1667>[...]

Airborne-NextGen 05.06.25: AF Uncrewed Fighters, Drones v Planes, Joby Crew Test

Also: AMA Names Tyler Dobbs, More Falcon 9 Ops, Firefly Launch Unsuccessful, Autonomous F-16s The Air Force has begun ground testing a future uncrewed jet design in a milestone tow>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC