AD: Airbus Canada Limited Partnership | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-05.05.25

Airborne-NextGen-05.06.25

AirborneUnlimited-05.07.25

Airborne-Unlimited-05.01.25

AirborneUnlimited-05.02.25

Tue, Jan 03, 2023

AD: Airbus Canada Limited Partnership

AD 2022-26-06 Prompted By Reports Of Flight Control (Horizontal Stab, Rudder, And Elevator) Decals Degrading And Peeling

The FAA is adopting a new airworthiness directive (AD) for certain Airbus Canada Limited Partnership Model BD-500-1A10 and BD-500-1A11 airplanes.

This AD was prompted by reports of flight control (horizontal stabilizer, rudder, and elevator) decals  degrading and peeling (damage), reports of operators painting over these decals, and reports that procedures to replace these decals were inaccurate, potentially causing incorrect positioning of replacement decals. This AD requires inspecting the left and right horizontal stabilizer decals for visibility and damage; and for certain airplanes, inspecting the rudder and left and right elevator decals for visibility and damage; and doing applicable corrective actions; as specified in a Transport Canada AD, which is incorporated by reference. The FAA is issuing this AD to address the unsafe condition on these products. This AD is effective February 2, 2023.

Supplementary Information: The FAA issued a notice of proposed rulemaking (NPRM) to amend 14 CFR part 39 by adding an AD that would apply to certain Airbus Canada Limited Partnership Model BD-500-1A10 and BD-500-1A11 airplanes. The NPRM published in the Federal Register on July 29, 2022 (87 FR 45709). The NPRM was prompted by AD CF-2022-01, dated January 7, 2022, issued by Transport Canada, which is the aviation authority for Canada (referred to after this as the MCAI).

The MCAI states that flight control decals have been degrading and peeling, operators have been painting over these decals, and procedures to replace these decals were inaccurate, potentially causing incorrect positioning of replacement decals. An investigation determined that the degradation and peeling of the flight control decals were caused by an incorrect clear protective coating being applied during production, and that flight control decals were being painted over because of unclear in-service procedures. The in-service procedures were revised to clearly state that the flight control decals are to be masked prior to painting, and to ensure the flight control decals are properly placed. Flight control decals that are damaged or incorrectly positioned could introduce rigging offset of flight control surfaces, which, when combined with other failures or severe maneuvers, could result in loss of flight control surface effectiveness or structural loading that exceeds the airframe's capability. See the MCAI for  additional background information.

In the NPRM, the FAA proposed to require inspecting the left and right horizontal stabilizer decals for visibility and damage; inspecting the rudder and left and right elevator decals for visibility and damage for certain airplanes; and doing applicable corrective actions.

You may examine the MCAI in the AD docket at regulations.gov under Docket No. FAA-2022-0981.

FMI: www.regulations.gov

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.07.25): Terminal Radar Service Area

Terminal Radar Service Area Airspace surrounding designated airports wherein ATC provides radar vectoring, sequencing, and separation on a full-time basis for all IFR and participa>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (05.07.25)

Aero Linx: Utah Back Country Pilots Association (UBCP) Through the sharing experiences, the UBCP has built upon a foundation of safe operating practices in some of the most challen>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: Anousheh Ansari -- The Woman Behind The Prize

From 2010 (YouTube Edition): Imagine... Be The Change... Inspire FROM 2010: One of the more unusual phone calls I have ever received occurred a few years ago... from Anousheh Ansar>[...]

NTSB Prelim: Bell 206B

(Pilot) Felt A Shudder And Heard The Engine Sounding Differently, Followed By The Engine Chip Detector Light On April 14, 2025, about 1800 Pacific daylight time, a Bell 206B, N1667>[...]

Airborne-NextGen 05.06.25: AF Uncrewed Fighters, Drones v Planes, Joby Crew Test

Also: AMA Names Tyler Dobbs, More Falcon 9 Ops, Firefly Launch Unsuccessful, Autonomous F-16s The Air Force has begun ground testing a future uncrewed jet design in a milestone tow>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC