NASA: Back to the Sixties? | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-11.17.25

AirborneNextGen-
11.11.25

Airborne-Unlimited-11.12.25

Airborne-FltTraining-11.13.25

AirborneUnlimited-11.14.25

LIVE MOSAIC Town Hall (Archived): www.airborne-live.net

Fri, Sep 19, 2003

NASA: Back to the Sixties?

'Capsule' Re-Entry Vehicles Will Push Space Technology 'Back' Ten Years

The next generation of re-entry vehicles NASA uses may look and act a lot like previous iterations. NASA is seriously considering returning to "capsule" technology, leapfrogging backwards over the 1970s-era Shuttle design.

A Reuters report says that, since Columbia's loss February 1, more and more in, and close to the space program, as well as a growing group in congress, are thinking out loud that capsules may be the way to come home, for a decade or more. Winged transport is losing favor.

Add to that, the Columbia Accident Investigation Board (CAIB) report that urged NASA to get on with whatever they're going to use, to replace the generation-old Shuttles.

NASA has developed procedures for an inflight patch kit, so that repairs to damage similar to Columbia's could be made during a mission; the agency admits, though, that it might not be copmprehensive-enough to have repaired the extensive damage the last shuttle suffered, as a piece of foam breached the wing's protective outer zone on takeoff.

No shuttle launches are scheduled until next Summer.

Could the current shuttle fleet continue to do the job? Not if NASA is to go much beyond the roughly 250-mile high orbit of the International Space Station. A current-technology shuttle would never survive a re-entry from a great distance -- like another moon shot.

So... does the next 'shuttle' have to have wings? NASA spokesman Bob Jacobs said this week, "We haven’t spelled out that it has to glide back to Earth and land like a plane. That’s not a requirement."

FMI: www.nasa.gov

Advertisement

More News

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (11.18.25)

“Setting eight speed records this quickly following its August entry into service is a powerful testament to the tremendous capabilities of this aircraft. We are already seei>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (11.18.25): On-Course Indication

On-Course Indication An indication on an instrument, which provides the pilot a visual means of determining that the aircraft is located on the centerline of a given navigational t>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (11.18.25)

Aero Linx: WW1 Aeroplanes, Inc. WORLD WAR 1 AEROPLANES was founded by Leo Opdycke in 1961 and incorporated as a federally recognized 501 (c) (3) not-for-profit corporation in 1979,>[...]

NTSB Final Report: Shoemaker Ronald R Pazmany PL-2

Pilot Reported That He Purchased The Airplane Earlier That Day Analysis: The pilot reported that he purchased the airplane earlier that day and completed a condition inspection tha>[...]

Airborne-NextGen 11.18.25: Dream Chaser Preps, Joby eTurbine, UAE Flt Test

Also: Abu Dhabi’s 1st Vertiport Network, Anduril-EDGE Partner, Vertical Permit/eVTOL Regs Sierra Space’s Dream Chaser spaceplane has cleared another round of pre-flight>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC