NASA: Back to the Sixties? | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-10.27.25

AirborneNextGen-
10.28.25

Airborne-Unlimited-10.29.25

Airborne-Unlimited-10.30.25

AirborneUnlimited-10.17.25

Fri, Sep 19, 2003

NASA: Back to the Sixties?

'Capsule' Re-Entry Vehicles Will Push Space Technology 'Back' Ten Years

The next generation of re-entry vehicles NASA uses may look and act a lot like previous iterations. NASA is seriously considering returning to "capsule" technology, leapfrogging backwards over the 1970s-era Shuttle design.

A Reuters report says that, since Columbia's loss February 1, more and more in, and close to the space program, as well as a growing group in congress, are thinking out loud that capsules may be the way to come home, for a decade or more. Winged transport is losing favor.

Add to that, the Columbia Accident Investigation Board (CAIB) report that urged NASA to get on with whatever they're going to use, to replace the generation-old Shuttles.

NASA has developed procedures for an inflight patch kit, so that repairs to damage similar to Columbia's could be made during a mission; the agency admits, though, that it might not be copmprehensive-enough to have repaired the extensive damage the last shuttle suffered, as a piece of foam breached the wing's protective outer zone on takeoff.

No shuttle launches are scheduled until next Summer.

Could the current shuttle fleet continue to do the job? Not if NASA is to go much beyond the roughly 250-mile high orbit of the International Space Station. A current-technology shuttle would never survive a re-entry from a great distance -- like another moon shot.

So... does the next 'shuttle' have to have wings? NASA spokesman Bob Jacobs said this week, "We haven’t spelled out that it has to glide back to Earth and land like a plane. That’s not a requirement."

FMI: www.nasa.gov

Advertisement

More News

NTSB Final Report: Dehavilland DHC-2 MK 1

During The Forced Landing, The Airplane’s Float Struts And Spreaderbars Collapsed Analysis: While en route to a remote fishing lodge in a float-equipped airplane, one of the >[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (10.29.25)

"X-59 is a symbol of American ingenuity. The American spirit knows no bounds. It's part of our DNA – the desire to go farther, faster, and even quieter than anyone has ever g>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (10.29.25)

Aero Linx: The Honourable Company of Air Pilots The advancement of the public interest by the promotion of safety for all those who are employed in connection with or who travel by>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (10.30.25): Minimum Friction Level

Minimum Friction Level The friction level specified in AC 150/5320-12, Measurement, Construction, and Maintenance of Skid Resistant Airport Pavement Surfaces, that represents the m>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (10.30.25)

Aero Linx: Aerospace Industries Association (AIA) For over 100 years, the American aerospace and defense industry has shaped the world around us. From the first flight to the moon >[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC