After 17 Years, FAA Finally Upgrades Airline Seat Rules | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-09.01.25 (Holiday)

Airborne-Unlimited-09.02.25

AirborneUnlimited-08.27.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-08.28.25

AirborneUnlimited-08.22.25

Thu, Oct 20, 2005

After 17 Years, FAA Finally Upgrades Airline Seat Rules

Stronger Seats Designed To Increase Crash Survivability

It's the kind of story for which you might want a fanfare. Something bold and brassy. After all, this has been a long-time coming.

After 17-years, the FAA has finally completed work on its rule requiring stronger passenger seats on commercial flights. The rule will affect aircraft built after 2009.

The seats will have to withstand 16-Gs -- compared to the 9-G requirement currently in effect. Same goes for the cabin floors and the tracks upon which the seats are mounted.

The rule does not require aircraft manufacturers to retrofit aircraft currently in service. That's a tip of the hat to the industry turmoil that broke out after the terrorist attacks of 2001.

Aircraft built since the 1990s already have seats that can withstand 16-Gs.

"It was not worth the minute safety benefit for retrofits," said John Hickey, director of FAA's Aircraft Certification Service, quoted by the Washington Post. "It's the right, sweet-spot solution -- it gives passengers the safety benefit at a very reasonable cost."

Indeed, the Post reports a retrofit solution would have cost the industry $519 million. The current solution will cost approximately $34 million between 2009 and 2034. In that period, the FAA estimates the airline industry will take delivery on 1,752 new aircraft with a total of 225,274 passenger seats.

"From a carrier perspective, this rule makes sense," Basil J. Barimo, vice president of operations and safety for the Air Transport Association, told the Post. "The FAA recognized they had a difficult case to make with retrofit design because a significant number of seats had already been replaced with 16-G compatible seats."

FMI: www.faa.gov

Advertisement

More News

Airborne 08.29.25: G800 Delivery, Alaska F-35 Crash, USCG-RCAF Medevac

Also: New SAF, Korean Air Buys 103 Boeings, Maryland SP Helo Rescue, OK AWOS Update Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation announced its first customer delivery of the all-new Gulfstream>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (08.30.25)

"This is just an absolute win win win. If there is a rejected takeoff we now have the confidence that the arrestor system will ensure passenger and crew safety." Source: FAA Admini>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (08.30.25): Low Approach

Low Approach An approach over an airport or runway following an instrument approach or a VFR approach including the go-around maneuver where the pilot intentionally does not make c>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (08.30.25)

Aero Linx: Historic Aircraft Association (HAA) The Historic Aircraft Association (HAA) was founded in 1979 with the aim of furthering the safe flying of historic aircraft in the UK>[...]

NTSB Final Report: Excalibur Excalibur

While Flying About 1,500 Ft Above Ground Level, A Large Bird Struck The Right Side Of The Airplane Analysis: The pilot reported that while flying about 1,500 ft above ground level,>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC