A4A: Five More Reasons To Oppose An Increase To The Passenger Facility Charge | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-07.07.25

Airborne-NextGen-07.08.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.25.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-06.26.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.27.25

Wed, May 08, 2019

A4A: Five More Reasons To Oppose An Increase To The Passenger Facility Charge

Proposal Would Double The Tax Passengers Pay On Airfares

Airline industry trade organization Airlines for America (A4A) has outlined five (more) reasons to reject any increase in the airport tax, also known as the Passengers Facility Charge (PFC).

Some airport executives, despite sitting on record revenues, want American families to pay more every time they fly. Right now there's an effort to double – or more – the PFC, the tax that air passengers pay on top of airfare, for every leg of their flight. A4A previously outlined five reasons to be against this tax increase. Here are five more:

Don't rob Peter to pay Paul. Paul's already loaded:
Did you know airports have their own trust fund? Last year the Aviation Trust Fund brought in $15.7 billion, but airports didn't use all of it. There's currently a $7 BILLION surplus in the Trust Fund. With this much unobligated money in the bank, why are airports lobbying Congress to tax everyday travelers even more?
    
Don't get left holding the bag:
Buying four airline tickets means paying four times the airport tax. When the average family of four travels, they can currently pay $72 in airport taxes (or PFCs), a cost that airports are happy to hide in ticket prices. If a cap on the tax is doubled, as some have suggested, families will have to dole out $144 just to cover the cost of the PFC on a round trip, one-stop ticket. That's money families would rather be spending at Disney or the beach, not filling airports' coffers with their hard-earned cash.
     
Airports are sitting on billions of dollars:
Airports would have you believe they are hurting for cash. Hardly. Though PFC tax collections just reached a new all-time high of $3.5 billion last year, they are just one piece of the airport revenue puzzle. Airports also have access to capital through other taxes, private-public partnerships with airlines and city governments, vendor rent and concessions, and parking fees. They have $14.5 billion in cash on hand, not to mention they raked in a record $30 billion in revenues.
    
It's the economy, stupid:
Raising taxes on everyone who flies will have a ripple effect that goes beyond the airlines and airports. Hotels and restaurants will take a hit. Local tourist attractions will take a hit, too. Businesses and their employees who make their livings from the traveling public will feel it the hardest.
    
Travelers going to and from smaller and rural areas will pay more:
It's important to note that airport taxes, PFCs, are tacked on each time a passenger boards an aircraft during their travel. Travelers flying to smaller rural communities, which require a layover more often than not, will suffer a disproportionate amount of PFC increases in comparison to the rest of the traveling public who frequently has access to direct flights.

(Source: A4A news release)

FMI: www.stopairtaxnow.com

Advertisement

More News

Airborne 06.30.25: US v ADS-B Misuse, NatÂ’l STOL Fire, Volocopter Resumes

Also: Netherlands Donates 18 F16s, 2 737s Collide On Ramp, E-7 Wedgetail Cut, AgEagle's 100th In S Korea The Pilot and Aircraft Privacy Act was introduced in the House by Represent>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (07.06.25)

“This delivery represents more than just a milestone. It symbolizes our shared commitment to national security and our unwavering support for the men and women who serve on t>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (07.06.25)

Aero Linx: Vintage Wings of Canada Foundation Vintage Wings of Canada is a not-for-profit, charitable organization with a collection of historically significant aircraft and is run>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: Portrait of the Army Aviation Heritage Foundation

From 2023 (YouTube Edition): To Preserve and Teach Incorporated as a non-profit domestic corporation in June 1997, the Army Aviation Heritage Foundation (AAHF) is a one-of-a-kind, >[...]

Airborne-NextGen 07.01.25: Volocopter Returns, B23 Energic, Iran Tech In UAVs?

Also: Air Taxis May Be Close, AgEagle Sells 100th, VAI Likes Bedford, AURA AERO Cleans Up Volocopter has resumed work towards the certification of its VoloCity eVTOL, this time und>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC