Lawsuits Against FAA, DOD, American Take Shape | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-12.08.25

AirborneNextGen-
12.09.25

Airborne-Unlimited-12.10.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-12.11.25

AirborneUnlimited-12.12.25

AFE 2025 LIVE MOSAIC Town Hall (Archived): www.airborne-live.net

Tue, Feb 04, 2025

Lawsuits Against FAA, DOD, American Take Shape

Government Officials Take the Blame for Fatal DC Crash

Families of the victims in January 29th’s midair collision near Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport (DCA) are beginning to explore legal action against the federal government. Statements from President Trump and other officials pinning blame on the military helicopter could play a major role in these claims.

Trump and his cabinet have publicly acknowledged fault in the crash, which involved an Army UH-60 Black Hawk helicopter and an American Eagle regional jet, killing 67 people.

“It was far above the 200 foot limit. That’s not really too complicated to understand, is it???" Trump stated.

Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth also suggested that the DOD would take responsibility, saying at a White House press conference, "No excuses, we’re going to get to the bottom of this… it never should have happened."

Under the Federal Tort Claims Act, victims’ families must file a notice of claim before pursuing litigation against the government. If the claim is denied or no decision is made within six months, they can proceed with a lawsuit. Cases against the government would be decided by a judge rather than a jury.

The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) preliminary investigation will take a month, with a final report expected in over a year. However, civil litigation against American Airlines, the FAA, and the DOD will not wait for the NTSB’s conclusions.

Attorneys will use flight recorder data, media reports, and forensic analysis to build their cases. While NTSB "probable cause" conclusions are not admissible in court, the underlying factual findings can be introduced as evidence.

Pittsburgh Attorney Jason Matzus, who has worked on similar cases, emphasized that non-economic damages will be the most compelling factor in settlements. “Claims will be significant. It’s premature, but conservatively speaking these will be multimillion-dollar claims each,” he said.

FMI: www.ntsb.gov

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (12.13.25): Light Gun

Light Gun A handheld directional light signaling device which emits a brilliant narrow beam of white, green, or red light as selected by the tower controller. The color and type of>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (12.13.25)

“We have performed extensive ground testing by comparing warm up times, full power tethered pulls, and overall temperatures in 100 degree environments against other aircraft >[...]

NTSB Final Report: Gippsland GA-8

While Taxiing To Parking The Right Landing Gear Leg Collapsed, Resulting In Substantial Damage Analysis: The pilot made a normal approach with full flaps and landed on the runway. >[...]

Classic Aero-TV: Historically Unique -- Marlin Horst's Exquisite Fairchild 71

From 2014 (YouTube Edition): Exotic Rebuild Reveals Aerial Work Of Art During EAA AirVenture 2014, ANN's Michael Maya Charles took the time to get a history lesson about a great ai>[...]

Airborne 12.12.25: Global 8000, Korea Pilot Honors, AV-30 Update

Also: Project Talon, McFarlane Acquisition, Sky-Tec Service, JPL Earth Helo Tests Bombardier has earned a round of applause from the business aviation community, celebrating the fo>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC