Lawsuits Against FAA, DOD, American Take Shape | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-06.23.25

Airborne-NextGen-06.24.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.25.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-06.26.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.27.25

Tue, Feb 04, 2025

Lawsuits Against FAA, DOD, American Take Shape

Government Officials Take the Blame for Fatal DC Crash

Families of the victims in January 29th’s midair collision near Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport (DCA) are beginning to explore legal action against the federal government. Statements from President Trump and other officials pinning blame on the military helicopter could play a major role in these claims.

Trump and his cabinet have publicly acknowledged fault in the crash, which involved an Army UH-60 Black Hawk helicopter and an American Eagle regional jet, killing 67 people.

“It was far above the 200 foot limit. That’s not really too complicated to understand, is it???" Trump stated.

Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth also suggested that the DOD would take responsibility, saying at a White House press conference, "No excuses, we’re going to get to the bottom of this… it never should have happened."

Under the Federal Tort Claims Act, victims’ families must file a notice of claim before pursuing litigation against the government. If the claim is denied or no decision is made within six months, they can proceed with a lawsuit. Cases against the government would be decided by a judge rather than a jury.

The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) preliminary investigation will take a month, with a final report expected in over a year. However, civil litigation against American Airlines, the FAA, and the DOD will not wait for the NTSB’s conclusions.

Attorneys will use flight recorder data, media reports, and forensic analysis to build their cases. While NTSB "probable cause" conclusions are not admissible in court, the underlying factual findings can be introduced as evidence.

Pittsburgh Attorney Jason Matzus, who has worked on similar cases, emphasized that non-economic damages will be the most compelling factor in settlements. “Claims will be significant. It’s premature, but conservatively speaking these will be multimillion-dollar claims each,” he said.

FMI: www.ntsb.gov

Advertisement

More News

NTSB Final Report: Douglas A-4K

Pilot Applied Full Aft Stick And Nose-Up Trim, But The Airplane Remained On The Runway Analysis: The pilot reported that a preflight inspection and flight control checks revealed n>[...]

ANN FAQ: Q&A 101

A Few Questions AND Answers To Help You Get MORE Out of ANN! 1) I forgot my password. How do I find it? 1) Easy... click here and give us your e-mail address--we'll send it to you >[...]

Classic Aero-TV: PBY Catalina--From Wartime to Double Sunrise to the Long Sunset

From 2022 (YouTube Edition): Before They’re All Gone... Humankind has been messing about in airplanes for almost 120-years. In that time, thousands of aircraft representing i>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (07.01.25): Advanced Air Mobility (AAM)

Advanced Air Mobility (AAM) A transportation system that transports people and property by air between two points in the NAS using aircraft with advanced technologies, including el>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (07.01.25)

Aero Linx: MQ-1B Predator The MQ-1B Predator is an armed, multi-mission, medium-altitude, long-endurance remotely piloted aircraft that is employed primarily as an intelligence-col>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC