EAA Comments on New FAA Destroyed and Scrapped Aircraft Policy | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-06.17.24

Airborne-NextGen-06.18.24

Airborne-Unlimited-06.12.24 Airborne-FltTraining-06.13.24

Airborne-Unlimited-06.14.24

Thu, Aug 24, 2023

EAA Comments on New FAA Destroyed and Scrapped Aircraft Policy

Journey’s End in Feds Meeting

The EAA has filed comments germane to a new FAA advisory circular (AC) titled Destroyed and Scrapped Aircraft. The AC makes extensive references to FAA’s Order 8900.19, with which it shares a title. Set forth in 2018, Order 8900.19 was issued without the customary solicitation of public comment.

The order and AC address the means and criteria by which determinations pertaining to the destruction and scrapping of aircraft are made. Aircraft declared fit for destruction and scrapping cannot, per 14 CFR 45.13 and 47.41, be rebuilt. Order 8900.19 defines a destroyed aircraft as having no repairable “primary structures” and a “scrapped” aircraft as “having been discarded and disposed of in a manner that it cannot be repaired to an airworthy condition.” Superficially, the antecedent interpretations appear reasonable insofar as they permit all but the most severely damaged aircraft to return to airworthiness after undergoing appropriate repairs.

EAA aims to ensure all FAA policies are consistent and reasonably applied in the proverbial field.

To the subject of the FAA’s new Destroyed and Scrapped Aircraft AC, the Association states: “While we are not aware of significant problems in the use of this policy in the past five years, EAA’s comments to the AC urge the greatest flexibility possible, including the expanded use of designees in determining a damaged or disposed aircraft’s status and developing a plan for return to service.”

The EAA continues: “We feel that more designee options would ease the workload on FAA field offices while bringing decision makers with ample practical experience into the fold.”

In its comments pertaining to the new FAA AC, the EAA contends: “This change would not remove the FSDO or [Aircraft Certification Branch] from being eligible to review repair data; rather, it would provide an additional option to the builder/repairer to utilize, if desired.”

FMI: www.eaa.org

Advertisement

More News

USCG MH-60 To The Rescue (Again) -- Rescues 4 Boaters

Capsized Vessel Located Near Dauphin Island, Alabama The Coast Guard rescued four boaters after their vessel capsized near Dauphin Island, Alabama, Thursday. Coast Guard District E>[...]

Gray Eagle Order Placed for Army National Guard

Reserve Components Looking to Improve In-House General Atomics Aeronautical Systems announced a fresh order for a dozen Gray Eagle 25M UAVs with accompanying equipment, for fulfill>[...]

Aero-Biz Survival 101 (1120a): Expert Ideas To Help You Through Tough Times

Brand New! Avoid The Need For A Comeback... Get Your Marketing Right, Right Now! Some time ago, the Aero-News Network, responding to numerous requests, established a marketing and >[...]

Airborne 06.03.24: Rotax 915/916 SB, Starship 4 Ready?, B-17 Mementos

Also: Hubble On Pause, FedEx Pilots Picket, Nexus eVTOL, VFS Honors The Rotax folks have published a Service Bulletin after issues were noted that may affect all R915i and R916i se>[...]

Mid-Continent Instruments and Avionics Mourns Former Leader

John W. Winter of AEA and Avionic Fame Passes John W. Winter brought Mid-Continent Instrument Company into the modern era in 1980, purchasing the firm and using it as a base for ex>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC