EAA Comments on New FAA Destroyed and Scrapped Aircraft Policy | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-05.12.25

Airborne-NextGen-05.06.25

AirborneUnlimited-05.07.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-05.08.25

AirborneUnlimited-05.09.25

Thu, Aug 24, 2023

EAA Comments on New FAA Destroyed and Scrapped Aircraft Policy

Journey’s End in Feds Meeting

The EAA has filed comments germane to a new FAA advisory circular (AC) titled Destroyed and Scrapped Aircraft. The AC makes extensive references to FAA’s Order 8900.19, with which it shares a title. Set forth in 2018, Order 8900.19 was issued without the customary solicitation of public comment.

The order and AC address the means and criteria by which determinations pertaining to the destruction and scrapping of aircraft are made. Aircraft declared fit for destruction and scrapping cannot, per 14 CFR 45.13 and 47.41, be rebuilt. Order 8900.19 defines a destroyed aircraft as having no repairable “primary structures” and a “scrapped” aircraft as “having been discarded and disposed of in a manner that it cannot be repaired to an airworthy condition.” Superficially, the antecedent interpretations appear reasonable insofar as they permit all but the most severely damaged aircraft to return to airworthiness after undergoing appropriate repairs.

EAA aims to ensure all FAA policies are consistent and reasonably applied in the proverbial field.

To the subject of the FAA’s new Destroyed and Scrapped Aircraft AC, the Association states: “While we are not aware of significant problems in the use of this policy in the past five years, EAA’s comments to the AC urge the greatest flexibility possible, including the expanded use of designees in determining a damaged or disposed aircraft’s status and developing a plan for return to service.”

The EAA continues: “We feel that more designee options would ease the workload on FAA field offices while bringing decision makers with ample practical experience into the fold.”

In its comments pertaining to the new FAA AC, the EAA contends: “This change would not remove the FSDO or [Aircraft Certification Branch] from being eligible to review repair data; rather, it would provide an additional option to the builder/repairer to utilize, if desired.”

FMI: www.eaa.org

Advertisement

More News

ANN FAQ: Follow Us On Instagram!

Get The Latest in Aviation News NOW on Instagram Are you on Instagram yet? It's been around for a few years, quietly picking up traction mostly thanks to everybody's new obsession >[...]

Classic Aero-TV: Innovation By Avilution – ‘Pilots Care About Results’

From 2019 (YouTube Edition): Panel Possibilities Range From LSA To eVTOL Aircraft For the most part, pilots care about the information being presented to them rather than how that >[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (05.09.25)

"Flight testing demonstrated significant performance improvements with the Pathfinder-equipped Husky. Compared to the baseline Type Certificated 2-blade Hartzell propeller, the 3-b>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.09.25): Estimated (EST)

Estimated (EST) When used in NOTAMs “EST” is a contraction that is used by the issuing authority only when the condition is expected to return to service prior to the e>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (05.09.25)

Aero Linx: Coalition of Airline Pilots Associations (CAPA) The Coalition of Airline Pilots Associations (CAPA) is the world’s largest pilot trade association representing ove>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC