100LL Lawsuit Called 'Legal Abuse' By NATA | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-05.05.25

Airborne-NextGen-05.06.25

AirborneUnlimited-05.07.25

Airborne-Unlimited-05.01.25

AirborneUnlimited-05.02.25

Thu, Feb 02, 2012

100LL Lawsuit Called 'Legal Abuse' By NATA

Coyne Warns GA Threatened In California

At a time when deficit spending and a business exodus in California threatens the state with a fiscal crisis next month, aviation business advocates are warning a lawsuit against the leaded avgas supply chain could devastate the aviation business in the state.

Writing in the Long Beach Business Journal, Sean Belk notes that the lawsuit by the Center for Environmental Health (CEH), which claims the producers and retailers of 100LL have violated state law by failing to warn the public about health hazards, threatens to assess significant civil penalties against the businesses.

CEH claims drinking water sources near seven airports in California are polluted with lead from avgas, and notes that LAX, Oakland International, John Wayne, San Diego and Long Beach airports are among the 12 highest lead producers of all US airports.

The Journal reports that James Coyne (pictured), president of the National Air Transportation Association (NATA), told industry officials at Toyota AirFlite at Long Beach Airport that the CEH’s lawsuit is a form of "legal abuse," since the suppliers of avgas are often required under lease agreements to provide the fuel to general aviation aircraft users. NATA is fighting the suit on behalf of the defendants, and has asked the FAA to get involved, but so far the agency has declined. NATA's attempt to have the CEH suit dismissed on the basis of federal preemption has been rejected by the courts, on the basis that aviation businesses have not yet suffered any actual economic damage.

Coyne tells the Journal, "We really got to get the message out to the business community...that aviation in California is facing a threat that exists nowhere else in America today. We have the State of California, individually, all by itself, deciding how dangerous aviation fuels are or not and imposing the threat of very, very significant mitigation which may lead to the abandonment of fuel for piston-aircraft if worse comes to worse."

FMI: www.nata.aero

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.07.25): Terminal Radar Service Area

Terminal Radar Service Area Airspace surrounding designated airports wherein ATC provides radar vectoring, sequencing, and separation on a full-time basis for all IFR and participa>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (05.07.25)

Aero Linx: Utah Back Country Pilots Association (UBCP) Through the sharing experiences, the UBCP has built upon a foundation of safe operating practices in some of the most challen>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: Anousheh Ansari -- The Woman Behind The Prize

From 2010 (YouTube Edition): Imagine... Be The Change... Inspire FROM 2010: One of the more unusual phone calls I have ever received occurred a few years ago... from Anousheh Ansar>[...]

NTSB Prelim: Bell 206B

(Pilot) Felt A Shudder And Heard The Engine Sounding Differently, Followed By The Engine Chip Detector Light On April 14, 2025, about 1800 Pacific daylight time, a Bell 206B, N1667>[...]

Airborne-NextGen 05.06.25: AF Uncrewed Fighters, Drones v Planes, Joby Crew Test

Also: AMA Names Tyler Dobbs, More Falcon 9 Ops, Firefly Launch Unsuccessful, Autonomous F-16s The Air Force has begun ground testing a future uncrewed jet design in a milestone tow>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC