AG Disapproves Aircraft Ban At Chatham Municipal Airport | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-12.01.25

AirborneNextGen-
12.02.25

Airborne-Unlimited-12.03.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-11.20.25

AirborneUnlimited-11.21.25

LIVE MOSAIC Town Hall (Archived): www.airborne-live.net

Fri, Dec 05, 2025

AG Disapproves Aircraft Ban At Chatham Municipal Airport

Town’s Bylaw Inconsistent With State Law And Not Legal

The Massachusetts State Attorney General’s Office has overturned a bylaw passed by the town of Chatham which voted in its May 2025 annual meeting to pass Article 59 that sought to prohibit aircraft with wingspans larger than 49 feet from landing at Chatham Municipal Airport (KCQX).

A letter from Assistant Attorney General Kelli E. Gunagan to Town Clerk Julie Smith stated that the bylaw was inconsistent with state law and therefore was disapproved.

Article 59 had passed by a margin of 26 votes, with airport critics arguing that the airport was designed to accommodate FAA-designated design group 1 aircraft – smaller airplanes with wingspans under 49 feet – and not turboprop aircraft with longer wingspans that have become more frequent users of the airport.

The critics also assert that the number of flights of the larger aircraft have exceeded the limit set by the FAA such that additional safety standards must be met.

Gunagan found that Article 59 was not consistent with the law since the Massachusetts legislature granted sole authority to regulate public airports to the Aeronautics Division of the Massachusetts Department of Transportation.

Gunagan did not make any determination regarding the policy issue concerning the size or type of aircraft using the airport.

She wrote, “A town’s independent authority to regulate airports is narrow, extending only to private landing areas,” adding that the bylaw does not fall within that narrow area. “Moreover, prohibiting certain aircraft from using the airport ‘prevents the achievement of a clearly identified purpose,’ namely that the responsibility for supervision and control of aeronautics has been confirmed upon MassDOT by the legislature,” while citing a decision involving the town of Wendell.

Gunagan also added in a footnote that the bylaw may be preempted by grant assurances the town agreed to when it accepted federal funds.

FMI:  www.faa.gov/

Advertisement

More News

Classic Aero-TV: VerdeGo Debuts VH-3 Hybrid-Electric Powerplant

From 2023 (YouTube Edition): New Propulsion Scheme Optimized for AAM Applications Founded in 2017 by Eric Bartsch, Pat Anderson, and Erik Lindbergh (grandson of famed aviation pion>[...]

NTSB Prelim: Grumman American Avn. Corp. AA-5B

During The Initial Climb, The Engine Began To Operate Abnormally And, After About Three Seconds, Experienced A Total Loss Of Power On October 29, 2025, about 1820 Pacific daylight >[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (12.02.25)

Aero Linx: Women in Aviation International Women in Aviation International is the largest nonprofit organization that envisions a world where the sky is open to all, and where avia>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (12.02.25)

“We’ve paid for the cable line’s repair for the customer and have apologized for the inconvenience this caused them...” Source: Some followup info from an A>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (12.03.25)

“We have long warned about the devastating effects of pairing optimization. Multiple times over many months, we highlighted how schedule manipulation, unbalanced schedules, a>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC