Ariane-5 Failure May Be Due to Cracks | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-12.01.25

AirborneNextGen-
12.02.25

Airborne-Unlimited-12.03.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-11.20.25

AirborneUnlimited-11.21.25

LIVE MOSAIC Town Hall (Archived): www.airborne-live.net

Thu, Jan 09, 2003

Ariane-5 Failure May Be Due to Cracks

Newest -5 Design Iteration Affected; Base Design OK

There may have been cracks in the cooling circuits of the hot-rodded Ariane-5 that blew up last month; and those cracks, while critical, aren't something that's likely to really foul up the entire European launch system.

The formal Inquiry Board, set up after the failed December launch attempt, concluded that, "...the most probable cause of the failure of Flight 157 was the simultaneous occurrence of two aggravating factors:

  • The degraded thermal condition of the nozzle due to fissures in the cooling tubes, and
  • Non-exhaustive definition of the loads to which the Vulcain 2 engine is subjected during flight

The board also noted that it would be difficult to simulate these additional loads during ground tests.

The newest-version Ariane-5 certainly needs attention, though.

On Wednesday, Arianespace boss Jean-Yves LeGall told the AP, "I consider that the generic Ariane-5 has been cleared by the commission’s work. We have no worries about the basic Ariane-5 launcher." Apparently, not all the rocket's engines failed; the asymmetric thrust, as well as the overall loss of power, doomed December's launch.

That kind of good news/bad news statement needs to be put into perspective. The Vulcain-2 engine is what makes the latest -5 such a workhorse: it can send 10 tons of expensive stuff into orbit, as opposed to the Vulcain-1's 7-ton limit.

The Vulcain-2 is slated to launch three times in 2003; repairs and modifications are expected to take six months. LeGall says the Vulcain-1-powered rockets will handle this year's launches, if necessary -- the heavier payloads aren't scheduled for at least a year.

The smaller Ariane-4 rockets continue to be launched and might shoulder some of the short-term launch load, even though their production has already stopped. The next Ariane-4 launch is set for February 11.

FMI: report

Advertisement

More News

Classic Aero-TV: VerdeGo Debuts VH-3 Hybrid-Electric Powerplant

From 2023 (YouTube Edition): New Propulsion Scheme Optimized for AAM Applications Founded in 2017 by Eric Bartsch, Pat Anderson, and Erik Lindbergh (grandson of famed aviation pion>[...]

NTSB Prelim: Grumman American Avn. Corp. AA-5B

During The Initial Climb, The Engine Began To Operate Abnormally And, After About Three Seconds, Experienced A Total Loss Of Power On October 29, 2025, about 1820 Pacific daylight >[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (12.02.25)

Aero Linx: Women in Aviation International Women in Aviation International is the largest nonprofit organization that envisions a world where the sky is open to all, and where avia>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (12.02.25)

“We’ve paid for the cable line’s repair for the customer and have apologized for the inconvenience this caused them...” Source: Some followup info from an A>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (12.03.25)

“We have long warned about the devastating effects of pairing optimization. Multiple times over many months, we highlighted how schedule manipulation, unbalanced schedules, a>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC