Ariane-5 Failure May Be Due to Cracks | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-12.08.25

AirborneNextGen-
12.09.25

Airborne-Unlimited-12.10.25

Airborne-FltTraining-12.04.25

AirborneUnlimited-12.05.25

AFE 2025 LIVE MOSAIC Town Hall (Archived): www.airborne-live.net

Thu, Jan 09, 2003

Ariane-5 Failure May Be Due to Cracks

Newest -5 Design Iteration Affected; Base Design OK

There may have been cracks in the cooling circuits of the hot-rodded Ariane-5 that blew up last month; and those cracks, while critical, aren't something that's likely to really foul up the entire European launch system.

The formal Inquiry Board, set up after the failed December launch attempt, concluded that, "...the most probable cause of the failure of Flight 157 was the simultaneous occurrence of two aggravating factors:

  • The degraded thermal condition of the nozzle due to fissures in the cooling tubes, and
  • Non-exhaustive definition of the loads to which the Vulcain 2 engine is subjected during flight

The board also noted that it would be difficult to simulate these additional loads during ground tests.

The newest-version Ariane-5 certainly needs attention, though.

On Wednesday, Arianespace boss Jean-Yves LeGall told the AP, "I consider that the generic Ariane-5 has been cleared by the commission’s work. We have no worries about the basic Ariane-5 launcher." Apparently, not all the rocket's engines failed; the asymmetric thrust, as well as the overall loss of power, doomed December's launch.

That kind of good news/bad news statement needs to be put into perspective. The Vulcain-2 engine is what makes the latest -5 such a workhorse: it can send 10 tons of expensive stuff into orbit, as opposed to the Vulcain-1's 7-ton limit.

The Vulcain-2 is slated to launch three times in 2003; repairs and modifications are expected to take six months. LeGall says the Vulcain-1-powered rockets will handle this year's launches, if necessary -- the heavier payloads aren't scheduled for at least a year.

The smaller Ariane-4 rockets continue to be launched and might shoulder some of the short-term launch load, even though their production has already stopped. The next Ariane-4 launch is set for February 11.

FMI: report

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (12.08.25): Decision Altitude (DA)

Decision Altitude (DA) A specified altitude (mean sea level (MSL)) on an instrument approach procedure (ILS, GLS, vertically guided RNAV) at which the pilot must decide whether to >[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (12.08.25)

Aero Linx: T-34 Association, Inc. The T-34 Association was formed in July 1975 so that individuals purchasing then military surplus T-34As had an organization which would provide s>[...]

NTSB Final Report: Piper PA-31T3

As He Released The Brakes To Begin Taxiing, The Brake Pedals Went To The Floor With No Braking Action Analysis: The pilot reported that during engine start up, he applied the brake>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (12.08.25)

“Legislation like the Mental Health in Aviation Act is still imperative to hold the FAA accountable for the changes they clearly acknowledge need to be made... We cannot wait>[...]

Airborne-Flight Training 12.04.25: Ldg Fee Danger, Av Mental Health, PC-7 MKX

Also: IAE Acquires Diamond Trainers, Army Drones, FedEx Pilots Warning, DA62 MPP To Dresden Tech Uni The danger to the flight training industry and our future pilots is clear. Dona>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC