Does The JSF Have A Weight Problem? | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-10.06.25

AirborneNextGen-
10.07.25

Airborne-Unlimited-10.08.25

Airborne-FlightTraining-10.09.25

AirborneUnlimited-10.10.25

Mon, May 17, 2004

Does The JSF Have A Weight Problem?

British Newspaper Says It's Too Heavy For UK Carriers

Like many Americans, the Joint Strike Fighter has a weight problem. So says the London Sunday Telegraph, which reports the new VTOL stealth warplane is 3,300 pounds too heavy to land on two new British aircraft carriers.

In British naval aviation, the JSF is slated to replace the venerable Harrier Jump Jet. But the Ministry of Defense in London says it's "concerned" that the JSF's weight problem will mean the aircraft won't be able to land vertically, causing huge headaches in the construction of those two new carriers.

The Telegraph cites a Lockheed-Martin analysis that it says points to weight problems in the JSF's engine. Although it's a revolutionary design, the engine itself weighs much more than had been planned for. The paper reports, if the VTOL version of the JSF has to be scrapped because of this problem, the carriers designed for it will have to be converted to a more conventional type. That conversion process could cost billions of dollars.

"Combat jets are like Formula One racing cars -- every part has a vital function -- you just can't get rid of it and still expect it work," said one unnamed MoD worker in an interview with the Telegraph. "I don't know how the weight is going to be reduced by 3,300 pounds. Until recently, the Americans were claiming it was only 1,000 pounds overweight, and they have spent a year and a half reducing that without success."

Rob Hewson, editor of Jane's Air Launched Weapons, said the JSF's weight problem could indeed be overwhelming. "This is going to cost at least 60 million pounds (sterling) to correct - if it can be corrected."

FMI: www.lockheedmartin.com

Advertisement

More News

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (10.16.25)

“This integration marks a significant step forward in cockpit connectivity and safety. It is one of few solutions offered to business aviation and rotorcraft operators that p>[...]

Airborne 10.15.25: Phantom 3500 Confounds, Citation CJ3 Gen2 TC, True Blue Power

Also: Kodiak 100 Joins USFS, Innovative Solutions & Support Renamed, Gulfstream Selects Honeywell, Special Olympics Airlift The Phantom 3500 mockup made an appearance where the>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (10.16.25): Enhanced Flight Vision System (EFVS)

Enhanced Flight Vision System (EFVS) An EFVS is an installed aircraft system which uses an electronic means to provide a display of the forward external scene topography (the natur>[...]

True Blue Power and Mid-Continent Instruments and Avionics Power NBAA25 Coverage

Mid-Continent Instruments and Avionics and True Blue Power ANN's NBAA 2025 Coverage... Visit Them At Booth #3436 True Blue Power Unveils 50 Amp-hour Lithium-ion, Main Ship Battery >[...]

NTSB Final Report: Bellanca 17-30A

Shortly After Takeoff, The Engine Completely Lost Power Analysis: The pilot reported that the engine start, run-up, and takeoff were without incident. However, shortly after takeof>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC