Does The JSF Have A Weight Problem? | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-12.01.25

AirborneNextGen-
12.02.25

Airborne-Unlimited-12.03.25

Airborne-FltTraining-12.04.25

AirborneUnlimited-12.05.25

AFE 2025 LIVE MOSAIC Town Hall (Archived): www.airborne-live.net

Mon, May 17, 2004

Does The JSF Have A Weight Problem?

British Newspaper Says It's Too Heavy For UK Carriers

Like many Americans, the Joint Strike Fighter has a weight problem. So says the London Sunday Telegraph, which reports the new VTOL stealth warplane is 3,300 pounds too heavy to land on two new British aircraft carriers.

In British naval aviation, the JSF is slated to replace the venerable Harrier Jump Jet. But the Ministry of Defense in London says it's "concerned" that the JSF's weight problem will mean the aircraft won't be able to land vertically, causing huge headaches in the construction of those two new carriers.

The Telegraph cites a Lockheed-Martin analysis that it says points to weight problems in the JSF's engine. Although it's a revolutionary design, the engine itself weighs much more than had been planned for. The paper reports, if the VTOL version of the JSF has to be scrapped because of this problem, the carriers designed for it will have to be converted to a more conventional type. That conversion process could cost billions of dollars.

"Combat jets are like Formula One racing cars -- every part has a vital function -- you just can't get rid of it and still expect it work," said one unnamed MoD worker in an interview with the Telegraph. "I don't know how the weight is going to be reduced by 3,300 pounds. Until recently, the Americans were claiming it was only 1,000 pounds overweight, and they have spent a year and a half reducing that without success."

Rob Hewson, editor of Jane's Air Launched Weapons, said the JSF's weight problem could indeed be overwhelming. "This is going to cost at least 60 million pounds (sterling) to correct - if it can be corrected."

FMI: www.lockheedmartin.com

Advertisement

More News

Aero-FAQ: Dave Juwel's Aviation Marketing Stories -- ITBOA BNITBOB

Dave Juwel's Aviation Marketing Stories ITBOA BNITBOB ... what does that mean? It's not gibberish, it's a lengthy acronym for "In The Business Of Aviation ... But Not In The Busine>[...]

NTSB Prelim: Rutan Long-EZ

The Pilot Attempted Several Times To Restart The Engine And Diverted To Long Beach Airport/Daughtery Field On October 20, 2025, about 1603 Pacific daylight time, an experimental am>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (12.05.25): Hazardous Weather Information

Hazardous Weather Information Summary of significant meteorological information (SIGMET/WS), convective significant meteorological information (convective SIGMET/WST), urgent pilot>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (12.05.25)

"The latest development underscores the government of Malaysia’s commitment in providing closure to the families affected by this tragedy..." Source: From statements made by >[...]

Airborne-Flight Training 12.04.25: Ldg Fee Danger, Av Mental Health, PC-7 MKX

Also: IAE Acquires Diamond Trainers, Army Drones, FedEx Pilots Warning, DA62 MPP To Dresden Tech Uni The danger to the flight training industry and our future pilots is clear. Dona>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC