Does The JSF Have A Weight Problem? | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-10.20.25

AirborneUnlimited-
10.14.25

Airborne-Unlimited-10.15.25

Airborne-NextGen-10.16.25

AirborneUnlimited-10.17.25

Mon, May 17, 2004

Does The JSF Have A Weight Problem?

British Newspaper Says It's Too Heavy For UK Carriers

Like many Americans, the Joint Strike Fighter has a weight problem. So says the London Sunday Telegraph, which reports the new VTOL stealth warplane is 3,300 pounds too heavy to land on two new British aircraft carriers.

In British naval aviation, the JSF is slated to replace the venerable Harrier Jump Jet. But the Ministry of Defense in London says it's "concerned" that the JSF's weight problem will mean the aircraft won't be able to land vertically, causing huge headaches in the construction of those two new carriers.

The Telegraph cites a Lockheed-Martin analysis that it says points to weight problems in the JSF's engine. Although it's a revolutionary design, the engine itself weighs much more than had been planned for. The paper reports, if the VTOL version of the JSF has to be scrapped because of this problem, the carriers designed for it will have to be converted to a more conventional type. That conversion process could cost billions of dollars.

"Combat jets are like Formula One racing cars -- every part has a vital function -- you just can't get rid of it and still expect it work," said one unnamed MoD worker in an interview with the Telegraph. "I don't know how the weight is going to be reduced by 3,300 pounds. Until recently, the Americans were claiming it was only 1,000 pounds overweight, and they have spent a year and a half reducing that without success."

Rob Hewson, editor of Jane's Air Launched Weapons, said the JSF's weight problem could indeed be overwhelming. "This is going to cost at least 60 million pounds (sterling) to correct - if it can be corrected."

FMI: www.lockheedmartin.com

Advertisement

More News

Airborne 10.15.25: Phantom 3500 Confounds, Citation CJ3 Gen2 TC, True Blue Power

Also: Kodiak 100 Joins USFS, Innovative Solutions & Support Renamed, Gulfstream Selects Honeywell, Special Olympics Airlift The Phantom 3500 mockup made an appearance where the>[...]

Airborne 10.14.25: Laser Threat, VeriJet BK, Duffy Threatens Problem Controllers

Also: USAF Pilots, Atlanta Tower Evac, Archer Spotlight Dissipates, Hop-A-Jet Sues A social-media call for people to point lasers at aircraft flying over Portland’s ICE facil>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (10.20.25)

“We developed this prototype from concept to reality in under a year. The U-Hawk continues the Black Hawk legacy of being the world’s premier utility aircraft and opens>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (10.20.25): Flameout Pattern

Flameout Pattern An approach normally conducted by a single-engine military aircraft experiencing loss or anticipating loss of engine power or control. The standard overhead approa>[...]

NTSB Final Report: Schweizer SGS 2-33A

Student Pilot’s Failure To Maintain Airspeed And Altitude Resulting In A Collision With The Ground During The Base To Final Turn Analysis: The solo student pilot reported she>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC