Cancer Survivor Sues TSA Over Pat-Down Search | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-SpecialEpisode-12.15.25

AirborneNextGen-
12.16.25

Airborne-Unlimited-12.10.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-12.11.25

AirborneUnlimited-12.12.25

AFE 2025 LIVE MOSAIC Town Hall (Archived): www.airborne-live.net

Fri, Dec 17, 2010

Cancer Survivor Sues TSA Over Pat-Down Search

Traveler Claims Search Was "Aggressive And Painful"

A breast cancer survivor who had recently undergone a radical mastectomy has filed a federal lawsuit against the TSA because of an "enhanced" pat-down search she underwent at Albuquerque's Sunport Airport on Aug. 25.

Adrienne Durso of Carlsbad, CA, filed the suit, claiming the search violates her 4th Amendment rights against unreasonable search. Television station KSWB and other media sources report that Durso was traveling with her son when the search occurred. She went through the metal detector, and was then told she had been selected for the pat-down.

Durso says she told the TSA screener about her mastectomy, and the agent concentrated on that area "forcefully applying pressure to the sensitive area," according to the court filing. Durso says that, after the pat-down, she complained to a supervisor about the aggressiveness of the search, and was told that it was the same search that everyone received. When her 17-year-old son asked why he was not searched in that way, the filing indicates that the supervisor said he "didn't have boobs."

Durso is one of four people involved in the suit. The others include a man who claims that a TSA screener spent an inordinate amount of time on his genital area, and a 12-year-old girl who says the full-body scan she was subjected to was done without the consent of her legal guardians.

The lawsuit, which was filed in U.S. District Court in Washington, DC, seeks to have screening methods changed, and seeks unspecified damages for the plaintiffs.

FMI: www.dcd.uscourts.gov

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (12.13.25): Light Gun

Light Gun A handheld directional light signaling device which emits a brilliant narrow beam of white, green, or red light as selected by the tower controller. The color and type of>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (12.13.25)

“We have performed extensive ground testing by comparing warm up times, full power tethered pulls, and overall temperatures in 100 degree environments against other aircraft >[...]

NTSB Final Report: Gippsland GA-8

While Taxiing To Parking The Right Landing Gear Leg Collapsed, Resulting In Substantial Damage Analysis: The pilot made a normal approach with full flaps and landed on the runway. >[...]

Classic Aero-TV: Historically Unique -- Marlin Horst's Exquisite Fairchild 71

From 2014 (YouTube Edition): Exotic Rebuild Reveals Aerial Work Of Art During EAA AirVenture 2014, ANN's Michael Maya Charles took the time to get a history lesson about a great ai>[...]

Airborne 12.12.25: Global 8000, Korea Pilot Honors, AV-30 Update

Also: Project Talon, McFarlane Acquisition, Sky-Tec Service, JPL Earth Helo Tests Bombardier has earned a round of applause from the business aviation community, celebrating the fo>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC