NTSB Recommends 'Seat Shockers' In Commercial Airliners | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.21.25

Airborne-NextGen-04.22.25

AirborneUnlimited-04.23.25

Airborne-FltTraining-04.24.25

AirborneUnlimited-04.25.25

Thu, Apr 01, 2010

NTSB Recommends 'Seat Shockers' In Commercial Airliners

Wants To Be Sure Pilots Are Paying Attention, Not Distracted

ANN April 1st Special Edition: The NTSB has issued a recommendation to the FAA that it require all commercial airliners be equipped with "seat shockers" for the pilot and co-pilot to avoid another "distracted pilot" incident.

After Northwest Flight 188 overflew its destination by 150 miles last October, the flight crew said they were "distracted" by a discussion of airline policy while looking at their laptop computers. NTSB Chairman Deborah Hersman said the FAA should require that all commercial airliners be equipped with a device slaved to the airplane's FMS that will give pilots a slight, but noticeable jolt through the seat as they approach their destination.

"We're not sure how that's supposed to be done, but we're sure it will increase safety," Hersman said. She said pilots could avoid the jolt by pressing a button on the instrument panel every half hour during flight.

The board also recommended that ATC should have the ability to activate the system for any aircraft that they are unable to contact for an extended period of time. "It should work through the transponder code," Hersman (pictured) said. "If the pilots don't respond to the radio, then a controller should be able to wake them up."

Pilots unions immediately reacted to the recommendation by saying the NTSB had no right to impugn their professionalism. "Our pilots don't deserve a kick in the pants no matter what the circumstances," said a spokesperson for one union not authorized to speak to the media. While questioning the logistics of such a system, NATCA members privately said (with a bit of a gleam in their eye) they would welcome the ability to get a pilot's attention.

Both Boeing and Airbus said such a system could add tens of thousands to dollars to the cost of new airplanes, and retrofits would be difficult. And, of course, the system would have to be shut off during takeoff and landing to prevent interference with the airplane's navigation equipment.

FMI: www.ntsb.gov

Advertisement

More News

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (04.28.25)

“While legendary World War II aircraft such as the Corsair and P-51 Mustang still were widely flown at the start of the Korean War in 1950, a new age of jets rapidly came to >[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.28.25): Decision Altitude (DA)

Decision Altitude (DA) A specified altitude (mean sea level (MSL)) on an instrument approach procedure (ILS, GLS, vertically guided RNAV) at which the pilot must decide whether to >[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.28.25)

Aero Linx: National Aviation Safety Foundation (NASF) The National Aviation Safety Foundation is a support group whose objective is to enhance aviation safety through educational p>[...]

Airborne-Flight Training 04.24.25: GA Refocused, Seminole/Epic, WestJet v TFWP

Also: Cal Poly Aviation Club, $$un Country, Arkansas Aviation Academy, Teamsters Local 2118 In response to two recent general aviation accidents that made national headlines, more >[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (04.29.25)

“The FAA is tasked with ensuring our skies are safe, and they do a great job at it, but there is something about the system that is holding up the medical process. Obviously,>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC