Coyne Challenges CA Flight School Fees In Letter To Gov Schwarzenegger | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-10.07.24

Airborne-NextGen-10.08.24

Airborne-Unlimited-10.02.24

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-10.03.24

Airborne-Unlimited-10.04.24

Sat, May 01, 2010

Coyne Challenges CA Flight School Fees In Letter To Gov Schwarzenegger

Flight Schools Being Regulated Like Private Colleges And Trade Schools

NATA President James K. Coyne (pictured) addressed California Governor Arnold Schwarzenegger this week in a letter asking that the state reconsider its inclusion of flight training providers in regulations issued by the Bureau of Private Post Secondary Education. These regulations are designed to ensure that students attending private colleges and trade schools are treated fairly and receive a quality education.

Proposed regulations issued by the bureau would require that affected flight training facilities, those with commercial pilot programs, submit an application for approval to operate within the state along with a $5,000 application fee. In order to receive approval to operate, a flight training facility would also have to submit third-party audited financial statements showing that the company has at least a 1:1 asset to debit ratio, remit 0.75% of its annual revenue to the California Student Tuition Recovery Fund and comply with numerous other administrative and recordkeeping requirements.

In his letter to Governor Schwarzenegger, Coyne points to the differences between the small businesses that provide flight training and the entities that the bureau was designed to regulate.

"One of the most burdensome requirements is that these flight training providers must submit audited financial statements demonstrating a 1:1 asset to liabilities ratio. Like most other small businesses, flight training providers do not have the resources or staff time available to submit to annual audits," Coyne concluded. "These providers cannot bear the cost of the[se] new regulations. [and] will be forced to leave the state. California cannot afford the cost of imposing unreasonable regulations on such a unique and valuable industry."

Under the current regulations, affected flight training providers must submit their first quarter Student Tuition Recovery Fund payments by May 17th and must submit their application for approval to operate along with the $5,000 fee by August of this year.

FMI: www.nata.aero

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (10.05.24): Final Approach Fix

Final Approach Fix The fix from which the final approach (IFR) to an airport is executed and which identifies the beginning of the final approach segment. It is designated on Gover>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (10.05.24)

Aero Linx: South Carolina Aviation Association (SCAA) The South Carolina Aviation Association is the only state-affiliated group for aviation professionals and enthusiasts. ere are>[...]

NTSB Prelim: Champion 7GCBC

The Wreckage Exhibited Signatures Consistent With A High Angle, Nose Down Impact On September 13, 2024, about 0803 Alaska daylight time (AKDT), a Champion (Citabria) 7GCBC, N8CK, w>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: Scion Helicopter’s Vixen SH-410

From Oshkosh 2024 (YouTube Vedition): The Composite, Carbon Fiber Helicopter Kit Aero-News Network correspondent Rex Alexander saw a new addition to the light helicopter market at >[...]

Airborne 10.02.24: Piper Wing Spar NPRM, Gogo Buys Satcom, Deadstick Drug Bust

Also: Former FAA Contractor Indicted, SpaceX Grounds Falcon, Buh-Bye KC-10, Sustainable Aviation Caucus The FAA has issued an NPRM that will expand the models of Piper aircraft tha>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC