Sat, Nov 12, 2011
New AD Would Supersede 2007 Directive For Popular Widebody
Engine
The FAA is set to supersede an existing airworthiness directive
(AD) that applies to all GE CF6-80C2B series turbofan engines. The
existing AD currently requires installing software version 8.2.Q1
to the engine electronic control unit (ECU), which increases the
engine's margin to flameout. Since that AD was issued, the FAA has
received reports of additional engine events.
The proposed AD, expected to be published Monday, would require
the removal of the affected ECUs from service. The AD is being
proposed to prevent engine flameout or un-commanded engine
in-flight shutdown (IFSD) of one or more engines, leading to an
emergency or forced landing of the airplane.
On May 30, 2007, AD 2007-12-07, Amendment 39-15085 was issued,
for all GE CF6-80C2B series turbofan engines. Since that AD was
issued, the FAA has received two reports of ice crystal condition
flameouts on engines equipped with the upgraded ECU software.
Prompted by these reports, GE developed ECU software version 8.2.R
with improved inclement weather capability, and enhanced fuel
metering valve (FMV) fault handling logic to reduce the risk of
engine IFSD caused by intermittent FMV feedback signals.
Subsequently, the FAA received reports of eight engine IFSD
events and four engine flameout ground events. These events were
caused by ignition system induced noise creating dual-channel
faults in the CPU. The event engines were operating with 8.2.Q1 and
8.2.R versions of ECU software and equipped with the new generation
of front panel assembly (FPA) and pressure subsystem (PSS) circuit
boards. Prompted by these reports, GE developed an ECU hardware fix
to eliminate the potential for dual-channel CPU faults due to
ignition system-induced noise. The proposed AD removes the affected
ECUs from the fleet.
The FAA estimates that the total cost of the AD to U.S.
operators to be $3.4 million. The AD would be open for comments
until January 13, 2012.
More News
Execute Missed Approach Instructions issued to a pilot making an instrument approach which means continue inbound to the missed approach point and execute the missed approach proce>[...]
“NORAD aircraft flew a safe and disciplined intercept of Russian Military Aircraft in the Alaska ADIZ... The conduct of one Russian Su-35 was unsafe, unprofessional, and enda>[...]
Dave Juwel's Aviation Marketing Stories ITBOA BNITBOB ... what does that mean? It's not gibberish, it's a lengthy acronym for "In The Business Of Aviation ... But Not In The Busine>[...]
Airplane Was Flying West Along The North Edge Of The Field When The Outboard 3 Ft Of The Right Wing Impacted A Power Transformer On September 5, 2024, about 1014 mountain daylight >[...]
The Wreckage Was Located At The Base Of An Approximate 100 Ft Tall Tree On September 6, 2024, about 1259 Pacific daylight time, a Boeing A75L3, N53466, was substantially damaged wh>[...]
ANN's Daily Aero-Term (10.02.24): Execute Missed Approach
See All