Friendly Fire Hearing Officer Recommends Against Courts-Martial | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-06.10.24

Airborne-NextGen-06.11.24

Airborne-Unlimited-06.12.24 Airborne-FltTraining-06.13.24

Airborne-Unlimited-06.14.24

Fri, Mar 21, 2003

Friendly Fire Hearing Officer Recommends Against Courts-Martial

The two Illinois Air National Guard F-16 Fighting Falcon pilots implicated in a deadly "friendly fire" incident last year should not face courts-martial, the investigating officer's report said.
Majs. Harry Schmidt and William Umbach, of the 170th Fighter Squadron, face a variety of charges stemming from the April 17, 2002, incident that killed four Canadian soldiers and injured eight others near Tarnak Farms, Afghanistan.

Schmidt reportedly dropped a 500-pound bomb on the Canadians, who were conducting night training. The two faced a Uniform Code of Military Justice Article 32 hearing in January to determine if there was enough evidence to proceed to court-martial. Col. Patrick Rosenow, the Article 32 hearing officer investigating the charges, has concluded that there is sufficient evidence to charge each pilot and try him by court-martial.

Click to EnlargeHowever, Rosenow's non-binding recommendation is that disciplinary action be handled through administrative action.

Specifically, Rosenow's report recommended that Schmidt's case be considered in a non-judicial or administrative forum in lieu of trial by court-martial, and that Umbach's case be considered in an administrative forum in lieu of court-martial. Rosenow asserted that the interests of good order and discipline could adequately be addressed by sanctions other than trial by court-martial.

Lt. Gen. Bruce Carlson, 8th Air Force commander and the general court-martial convening authority, will review the report and advisory recommendations before deciding on each case.

His options include referral of some or all of the charges to court-martial, non-judicial punishment, administrative sanctions, or dismissal of some or all of the charges with no further action.

Schmidt had been charged with four counts of involuntary manslaughter, eight counts of assault, and dereliction of duty by failing to exercise appropriate flight discipline and failing to comply with the rules of engagement in Afghanistan.

Umbach faces the same charges besides an allegation that he, as flight commander at the time, failed to ensure that Schmidt complied with the rules of engagement.

FMI: www.af.mil

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (06.11.24): Abeam

Abeam An aircraft is “abeam” a fix, point, or object when that fix, point, or object is approximately 90 degrees to the right or left of the aircraft track. Abeam indic>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (06.11.24)

Aero Linx: The Air Charter Safety Alliance The group, called the Air Charter Safety Alliance, will raise awareness of illegal charter flights among potential customers, charter bro>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (06.11.24)

“For months, ALPA has been sounding the alarm on the ongoing efforts by some aircraft manufacturers to remove pilots from the flight deck and replace them with automation. To>[...]

Airborne Affordable Flyers 06.06.24: 200th ALTO, Rotax SB, Risen 916iSV

Also: uAvionix AV-Link, Does Simming Make Better Pilots?, World Games, AMA National Fun Fly Czech sportplane manufacturer Direct Fly has finished delivering its 200th ALTO NG, the >[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (06.12.24)

“The legislation now includes a task force with industry representation ensuring that we have a seat at the table and our voice will be heard as conversations about the futur>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC