Ruling In Mile-Hi Noise Suit Expected This Week | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-12.08.25

AirborneNextGen-
12.09.25

Airborne-Unlimited-12.10.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-12.11.25

AirborneUnlimited-12.12.25

AFE 2025 LIVE MOSAIC Town Hall (Archived): www.airborne-live.net

Tue, May 12, 2015

Ruling In Mile-Hi Noise Suit Expected This Week

Residents Sued Over Noise Made By Airplanes Operated By The Skydiving Company

After closing arguments last week, Boulder County (CO) District Court Judge Judith LaBuda said that she would have a ruling soon in the case pitting residents of Longmont and Boulder County against a skydiving company in the regions.

The residents, all members of a group calling itself Citizens for Quiet Skies, brought the suit alleging that planes belonging to Mile-Hi Skydiving are too loud over their homes when operating from Longmont's Vance Brand Municipal Airport. And the attorney for the citizens said in his closing arguments that the company could be a better neighbor and "fly friendly," but choose not to do so. They are asking for a remedy that "the court can reasonably enforce," according to a report in the Times-Call newspaper.

But Mile-Hi owner Frank Casares says that the company follows all FAA regulations, and the judge has no jurisdiction over the routes or number of flights. Attorney Anthony Leffert said in closing arguments that the noise level and frequency of the flights are not relevant to the judge, and that the citizens group has a remedy under federal law in the form of a request for a formal noise study. Leffert said that the leader of the group, Kim Gibbs, has been trying to put Mile-Hi out of business over the past several years, and that is relevant to the judge.

Judge LaBuda said both parties had until May 15 to submit additional documentation to support their cases, and that she would issue a ruling not later than May 22.

FMI: www.courts.state.co.us/Courts/County/Contact.cfm?County_ID=62

Advertisement

More News

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (12.11.25)

"The owners envisioned something modern and distinctive, yet deeply meaningful. We collaborated closely to refine the flag design so it complemented the aircraft’s contours w>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (12.11.25): Nonradar Arrival

Nonradar Arrival An aircraft arriving at an airport without radar service or at an airport served by a radar facility and radar contact has not been established or has been termina>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: David Uhl and the Lofty Art of Aircraft Portraiture

From 2022 (YouTube Edition): Still Life with Verve David Uhl was born into a family of engineers and artists—a backdrop conducive to his gleaning a keen appreciation for the >[...]

Airborne-NextGen 12.09.25: Amazon Crash, China Rocket Accident, UAV Black Hawk

Also: Electra Goes Military, Miami Air Taxi, Hypersonics Lab, MagniX HeliStrom Amazon’s Prime Air drones are back in the spotlight after one of its newest MK30 delivery drone>[...]

Airborne 12.05.25: Thunderbird Ejects, Lost Air india 737, Dynon Update

Also: Trailblazing Aviator Betty Stewart, Wind Farm Scrutiny, Chatham Ban Overturned, Airbus Shares Dive A Thunderbird pilot, ID'ed alternately as Thunderbird 5 or Thunderbird 6, (>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC