$2 Million Settlement Reached In Cory Lidle Suit | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-12.01.25

AirborneNextGen-
12.02.25

Airborne-Unlimited-12.03.25

Airborne-FltTraining-12.04.25

AirborneUnlimited-12.05.25

AFE 2025 LIVE MOSAIC Town Hall (Archived): www.airborne-live.net

Wed, Oct 07, 2009

$2 Million Settlement Reached In Cory Lidle Suit

Estates Had "No Other Assets Worth Pursuing"

Plaintiffs who suffered losses when a Cirrus SR-20 crashed into a high-rise apartment building in Manhattan on October 11th, 2006 have dropped a $60 million lawsuit, and have agreed to settle for $2 million, according to the mediator in the case.

The NTSB was unable to determine whether Cory Lidle (pictured, right), a pitcher for the New York Yankees, or his flight instructor, 26-year-old Tyler Stanger, was at the controls of the aircraft when it attempted a 180 degree turn in tight quarters and impacted the building. Several pedestrians were injured when debris fell from the crash site, and there were millions of dollars in property damage to the building.

The online site Law.com reports that the plaintiffs dropped the suit because both Lidle and Stanger carried $1 million in life insurance, and their estates had "no other assets worth pursuing" in the case. One personal injury claimant did not accept the settlement.

Lidle was a licensed pilot. The NTSB determined the cause of the accident to be "the pilots' inadequate planning, judgment and airmanship in trying to make a 180-degree turn led to the crash," but never determined precisely who was pilot-in-command.

Cirrus SR-20 File Photo

Law.com reports that the $2 million will be split between insurance companies that claim to have paid out $16.5 million for damages to the building and personal injury.

A product liability suit has been filed against Cirrus by Lidle's widow and Stanger's estate, despite NTSB data that tends to indicate that the airframe was not a significant factor in the cause of this tragic accident.

FMI: www.cirrusaircraft.com

Advertisement

More News

Aero-FAQ: Dave Juwel's Aviation Marketing Stories -- ITBOA BNITBOB

Dave Juwel's Aviation Marketing Stories ITBOA BNITBOB ... what does that mean? It's not gibberish, it's a lengthy acronym for "In The Business Of Aviation ... But Not In The Busine>[...]

NTSB Prelim: Rutan Long-EZ

The Pilot Attempted Several Times To Restart The Engine And Diverted To Long Beach Airport/Daughtery Field On October 20, 2025, about 1603 Pacific daylight time, an experimental am>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (12.05.25): Hazardous Weather Information

Hazardous Weather Information Summary of significant meteorological information (SIGMET/WS), convective significant meteorological information (convective SIGMET/WST), urgent pilot>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (12.05.25)

"The latest development underscores the government of Malaysia’s commitment in providing closure to the families affected by this tragedy..." Source: From statements made by >[...]

Airborne-Flight Training 12.04.25: Ldg Fee Danger, Av Mental Health, PC-7 MKX

Also: IAE Acquires Diamond Trainers, Army Drones, FedEx Pilots Warning, DA62 MPP To Dresden Tech Uni The danger to the flight training industry and our future pilots is clear. Dona>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC