Lawyer: Airplane Type Involved In Texas Accident Has A History Of Engine Issues | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-06.23.25

Airborne-NextGen-06.24.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.25.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-06.26.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.27.25

Tue, Sep 16, 2014

Lawyer: Airplane Type Involved In Texas Accident Has A History Of Engine Issues

Day Care Company CEO Fatally Injured In Accident Last Week

The type of airplane involved in an accident last Wednesday that fatally injured the CEO of a chain of day care centers in Texas has a history of engine issues, according to a lawyer who is also a licensed pilot.

The accident, which occurred September 10th, fatally injured 55-year-old David Anderson of Dallas, who along with his wife were co-owners and operators of the Play and Go Depot day care centers in northern Texas. Anderson had been a licensed pilot since 1975. The airplane, a Piper Aerostar, was registered to Anderson.

The Dallas Business Journal reports that the plane went down near Austin-Bergstrom airport at 1:26 p.m. local time. Anderson had departed from Dallas at 12:30 pm, according to the FAA, and did not report any issues with the airplane prior to the accident.

Attorney Mike Slack said in an interview with the paper that the Piper Aerostar has a "long history of engine failure" during the takeoff and landing phases of flight, and that "any kind of disruption in the normal sequence of events in the landing or the takeoff of the Aerostar is prone to cause problems and usually a crash."

Of course, the NTSB as yet hasn't even released a preliminary report from the accident.

Slack told the paper that the Aerostar "is a great airplane when both engines are operating at altitude," but it can be "unforgiving" if there is any kind of "anomaly."

Slack said that it was unlikely that Piper would be sued in connection with the accident because the airplane was manufactured in 1975, and a federal law makes suits against manufacturers involving airplanes more than 18 years old "difficult." He also said that the Aerostar was manufactured by Piper before they went through a bankruptcy, and the terms of the reorganization of the company included a discharge of liability for the Aerostar.

(Image from file. Not accident airplane)

FMI: www.slackdavis.com

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (06.29.25)

Aero Linx: Transport Canada We are a federal institution, leading the Transport Canada portfolio and working with our partners. Transport Canada is responsible for transportation p>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (06.29.25): Gross Navigation Error (GNE)

Gross Navigation Error (GNE) A lateral deviation from a cleared track, normally in excess of 25 Nautical Miles (NM). More stringent standards (for example, 10NM in some parts of th>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: Anticipating Futurespace - Blue Origin Visits Airventure 2017

From AirVenture 2017 (YouTube Edition): Flight-Proven Booster On Display At AirVenture… EAA AirVenture Oshkosh is known primarily as a celebration of experimental and amateu>[...]

NTSB Final Report: Cirrus SR22

Aircraft Parachute System (CAPS) Was Deployed About 293 Ft Above Ground Level, Which Was Too Low To Allow For Full Deployment Of The Parachute System Analysis: The day before the a>[...]

Airborne Affordable Flyers 06.26.25: PA18 Upgrades, ‘Delta Force’, Rhinebeck

Also: 48th Annual Air Race Classic, Hot Air Balloon Fire, FAA v Banning 100LL, Complete Remote Pilot The news Piper PA-18 Super Cub owners have been waiting for has finally arrived>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC