Judge Rules In Favor Of Airport In Eminent Domain Case | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-11.03.25

AirborneNextGen-
11.04.25

Airborne-Unlimited-11.05.25

Airborne-Unlimited-11.06.25

AirborneUnlimited-10.17.25

Affordable Flying Expo Tickets (Discount Code: AFE2025): CLICK HERE!
LIVE MOSAIC Town Hall, 1800ET, 11.07.25: www.airborne-live.net

Fri, May 08, 2015

Judge Rules In Favor Of Airport In Eminent Domain Case

Says Township Was 'Deceptive' In Taking Of Solberg Airport Property

A New Jersey judge has ruled that Readington Township attempted to deceive and manipulate voters in 2006 in an effort to limit expansion and take control of Solberg Airport (N51), a family-run airfield west of Newark.

In 2006, voters approved borrowing $22 million for the "preservation" of lands around the airport by a 55-45 percent margin, according to a report appearing on www.nj.com. But the judge found that the township "engaged in an elaborate public agitation effort to incite voter opposition" to the airport, which led to an "opaque condemnation action." 

Under the voter-approved ballot measure, it was understood that township officials would negotiate with the Solberg family, but five months later, the Township Committee took the land by eminent domain. Judge Armstrong called that action "subversion" which "challenges the protections that sharply limit" such condemnations.

The ruling said that the Solbergs were able to show that the township had opposed expansion of the airport for decades.

The judge said that the township had hired a public relations firm specifically to raise concerns that the small, GA airport would become a jetport, and promote a "major not-in-my-back-yard" campaign to block runway expansion.

A post on the airport's website said that "the question that should be asked at this point is not what happened, but why it happened. Why were the Solbergs, who are lifelong residents of Readington and whose families intend to remain in Readington, subjected to the kind of treatment that here occurred for at least two decades and probably more? Why were the Solbergs, and all of the other taxpayers of Readington, put to the enormous expense that has saturated this matter for all of these years? The result of Judge Armstrong’s Decision is that Readington, in addition to the millions it has paid out to its own counsel, experts, and consultants over the years, will now be held responsible for such amounts as the Court determines to be due to the Solbergs under the law as a result of the Decision, which amounts will also likely be in the millions.

"None of this was necessary. It was the result of the myopic view that Solberg Airport was going to become another LaGuardia being drummed into the collective psyche of too many misled citizens."

FMI: Judge Armstrong's Ruling

Advertisement

More News

Airborne 11.05.25: Tesla Flying Car?, Jepp/ForeFlight Sold, A220 Troubles

Also: AFE25 Tickets!, Jamaica Recovery, E-Aircraft at Boeing Fld, Diamond DA50 RG Cert Elon Musk is once again promising the impossible…this time, in the form of a Tesla tha>[...]

Airborne 11.07.25: Affordable Expo Starts!, Duffy Worries, Isaacman!

Also: Louisville UPS Crash Aftermath, Taiwan Boosts Pilot Pool, Spartan Acquires, DON’T MISS the MOSAIC Town Hall! This three-day Affordable Flying Expo brings together indoo>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (11.05.25)

“Our strategic partnership with AutoFlight, backed by their substantial technological expertise and tangible advancements in eVTOL airworthiness, represents a significant mil>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (11.05.25)

Aero Linx: British Gliding Association (BGA) The British Gliding Association is the governing body for the sport of gliding in the UK and members are the 76 clubs that provide glid>[...]

NTSB Prelim: Cirrus Design Corp SR22

While Descending Toward ASN, He Advanced The Throttle, But The Engine Did Not Respond On October 2, 2025, at 1126 central daylight time, a Cirrus SR22, N812SE, was substantially da>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC