Americans Want New Set Of Goals Before Shuttles Return To Space | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-06.23.25

Airborne-NextGen-06.24.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.25.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-06.26.25

AirborneUnlimited-06.27.25

Mon, Jul 21, 2003

Americans Want New Set Of Goals Before Shuttles Return To Space

Poll Shows Support For Manned Spaceflight, But Need For Redefinition

In the wake of the Columbia tragedy, Americans remain firmly behind NASA and manned space flight. But a new poll commissioned by the Houston Chronicle shows people don't want to return to space without a new set of goals -- reasons for being there.

More than two-thirds of the 800 people questioned by Zogby International said NASA is doing an excellent or good job of directing the nation's space program. An overwhelming majority, 83 percent, said they thought it was important to the country's international prestige to have humans flying in space.

Keep 'Em Flying

That could be cause for a big sigh of relief at both the Kennedy and Johnson space centers. "Support for a manned space program has always been strong, and no president has been willing to cancel it," said Roger Launius, a historian with the National Air and Space Museum and former senior NASA historian. "It is a consensus that lasts in this nation. This poll confirms that, and no elected officials are going to challenge that."

The poll shows, while Americans are bullish on continued shuttle flights, they're a little less certain whether the remaining space planes have aged to the point where they're just too dangerous. Simply put, the poll shows, most Americans want the whole nature of the shuttle program rethought and redefined.

Fifty-four percent of those polled said the CAIB shouldn't focus only on the cause of the Columbia disaster. Instead, the majority asked believes NASA should take a broader look at the direction the space program is going. Forty-three percent said the board should focus narrowly on the cause of the accident, fix the problems and get back to flying as quickly as possible.

Where From Here?

Forty percent of those asked said building a new orbiter to replace the aging space shuttles should be NASA's top priority. Thirty percent said the space agency's top task should be finishing the international space station. Another 10 percent said NASA has to establish a base on the moon. Finally, 9 percent said going to Mars should be the priority.

FMI: www.caib.us, www.nasa.gov

Advertisement

More News

NTSB Prelim: Piper PA-23

Pilot Also Reported That Due To A Fuel Leak, The Auxiliary Fuel Tanks Were Not Used On June 4, 2025, at 13:41 eastern daylight time, a Piper PA-23, N2109P, was substantially damage>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: One Man’s Vietnam

From 2023 (YouTube Edition): Reflections on War’s Collective Lessons and Cyclical Nature The exigencies of war ought be colorblind. Inane social-constructs the likes of racis>[...]

NTSB Final Report: Capella Aircraft Corp FW1C50

Pilot Reported That He Was Unfamiliar With The Single Seat Amateur-Built Airplane And His Intent Was To Perform High-Speed Taxi Testing Analysis: The pilot reported that he was unf>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: Timber Tiger Touts Curtiss Jenny Replicas

From 2023 (YouTube Edition): First Kits to Ship October 2023 Having formerly resurrected the storied shape of the Ryan ST—in effigy, anyway—Montrose, Colorado-based Tim>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (07.04.25): Performance-Based Navigation (PBN) [ICAO]

Performance-Based Navigation (PBN) [ICAO] Area navigation based on performance requirements for aircraft operating along an ATS route, on an instrument approach procedure or in a d>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC