Sun, Aug 20, 2017
Does not Include All Capabilities They Expect Will Produce Benefits
The DOT's Office of Inspector General has responded to a request from the leadership of the House Transportation Committee and its Aviation subcommittee concerning a review of the FAA's benefits projection in its July 2016 Next Generation Air Transportation System (NextGen) Business Case.
In its business case, FAA projected that NextGen will deliver about $161 billion in benefits by 2030, of which the Agency states that $2.7 billion has already been delivered to airspace users and the traveling public. At the Chairmen’s request, we provided information on the: (1) programs FAA included as NextGen programs and whether projected benefits represent a realistic assessment, (2) assumptions behind FAA’s benefits calculations, and (3) various groups FAA assumes will benefit and how the benefits are valued.
In the 18-page letter sent to Full Committee Chair Bill Shuster (R-PA) and Frank LoBiondo (R-NJ), Inspector General, Calvin Scovel III said that the office found that the FAA’s benefits estimate is overly optimistic given past experience with introducing new capabilities and the use of out-of-date schedules for some key projects.
The majority of FAA’s estimates are for new capabilities that have not yet been implemented, and some new capabilities continue to face challenges in delivering benefits to airspace users. In addition, while FAA recognizes that the key assumptions behind its benefits calculations are aggressive, the Agency does not provide alternative outcomes or adjust for risks that may impact the delivery of benefits to airspace users. Further, FAA relies heavily on valuing the time saved by passengers to make a positive business case for NextGen.
While this is a generally accepted practice, some airline representatives are concerned that reporting benefits in one, broad category makes it appear that airlines are receiving more substantial benefits than they actually have achieved.
FAA officials also noted that the business case does not include all capabilities that they expect will produce benefits but have yet to be quantified. As a result, FAA’s business case does not communicate the range of uncertainty or complex factors associated with NextGen implementation.
(Source: DOT OIG)
More News
Option Approach An approach requested and conducted by a pilot which will result in either a touch-and-go, missed approach, low approach, stop-and-go, or full stop landing. Pilots >[...]
"Emirates is already the world's largest Boeing 777 operator, and we are expanding our commitment to the program today with additional orders for 65 Boeing 777-9s. This is a long-t>[...]
(Pilot) Reported That There Was A Sudden And Violent Vibration Throughout The Airplane That Lasted Several Seconds Analysis: The pilot was returning to his home airport at an altit>[...]
“This recognition was evident during the TBMOPA Annual Convention, where owners and operators clearly expressed their satisfaction with our focus on customer service, and enc>[...]
Overhead Maneuver A series of predetermined maneuvers prescribed for aircraft (often in formation) for entry into the visual flight rules (VFR) traffic pattern and to proceed to a >[...]
ANN's Daily Aero-Term (11.19.25): Option Approach
See All