Sun, Aug 20, 2017
Does not Include All Capabilities They Expect Will Produce Benefits
The DOT's Office of Inspector General has responded to a request from the leadership of the House Transportation Committee and its Aviation subcommittee concerning a review of the FAA's benefits projection in its July 2016 Next Generation Air Transportation System (NextGen) Business Case.

In its business case, FAA projected that NextGen will deliver about $161 billion in benefits by 2030, of which the Agency states that $2.7 billion has already been delivered to airspace users and the traveling public. At the Chairmen’s request, we provided information on the: (1) programs FAA included as NextGen programs and whether projected benefits represent a realistic assessment, (2) assumptions behind FAA’s benefits calculations, and (3) various groups FAA assumes will benefit and how the benefits are valued.
In the 18-page letter sent to Full Committee Chair Bill Shuster (R-PA) and Frank LoBiondo (R-NJ), Inspector General, Calvin Scovel III said that the office found that the FAA’s benefits estimate is overly optimistic given past experience with introducing new capabilities and the use of out-of-date schedules for some key projects.
The majority of FAA’s estimates are for new capabilities that have not yet been implemented, and some new capabilities continue to face challenges in delivering benefits to airspace users. In addition, while FAA recognizes that the key assumptions behind its benefits calculations are aggressive, the Agency does not provide alternative outcomes or adjust for risks that may impact the delivery of benefits to airspace users. Further, FAA relies heavily on valuing the time saved by passengers to make a positive business case for NextGen.
While this is a generally accepted practice, some airline representatives are concerned that reporting benefits in one, broad category makes it appear that airlines are receiving more substantial benefits than they actually have achieved.
FAA officials also noted that the business case does not include all capabilities that they expect will produce benefits but have yet to be quantified. As a result, FAA’s business case does not communicate the range of uncertainty or complex factors associated with NextGen implementation.
(Source: DOT OIG)
More News
Also: Horizon Picks P&W PT6A, Army Buys 3 EagleNXT, First Hybrid-Electric Regional, Army Selects AEVEX Anduril Industries’ YFQ-44A Collaborative Combat Aircraft was flown>[...]
While Flying North Along The Beach At About 300 Ft Above Ground Level, The Pilot Reported That The Engine RPM Dropped To About Idle On September 28, 2025, at 1126 eastern daylight >[...]
Aero Linx: European Association of Aviation Training and Educational Organisations (EATEO) Welcome to the “ European Association of Aviation Training and Education Organizati>[...]
On-Course Indication An indication on an instrument, which provides the pilot a visual means of determining that the aircraft is located on the centerline of a given navigational t>[...]
“It also gives us the hard data we need to shape requirements, reduce risk, and ensure the CCA program delivers combat capability on a pace and scale that keeps us ahead of t>[...]