Airplane Noise Committee Says FAA Should Alter New KSFO Flight Paths | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-11.24.25

AirborneNextGen-
11.18.25

Airborne-Unlimited-11.19.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-11.20.25

AirborneUnlimited-11.21.25

LIVE MOSAIC Town Hall (Archived): www.airborne-live.net

Thu, Dec 01, 2016

Airplane Noise Committee Says FAA Should Alter New KSFO Flight Paths

Recommends Higher Approach Altitudes And Procedural Changes

After four months of work, the Select Committee on South Bay Arrivals has recommended some changes to the new approach corridors over Palo Alto, Mountain View, Menlo Park, East Palo Alto, and other communities south of San Francisco International Airport (KSFO).

The Palo Alto Weekly newspaper reports that the committee produced a 44-page report that includes ideas ranging from a change in nighttime flight hours to changing routes aircraft use on approach to the airport.

The flight paths became an issue when after the FAA implemented NextGen approach procedures into KSFO in 2015 which took aircraft over communities that had not previously seen a lot of air traffic. The most controversial route shifted a flight path three miles to the east, and was intended for Optimal Profile Descent under NextGen. But there was a conflict with other restricted airspace around KSFO, and pilots were required to carry power and then use "speed braking" to reduce airspeed on approach, which created more noise. The route, known as SERFR, generated more than a million complaints, according to the committee's report.

The committee recommended returning that route to the previous Big Sur flight path. However, that recommendation was opposed by members of the committee who live in the towns underneath that flight path. It also recommended that the FAA establish a minimum altitude over the MENLO waypoint of 5,000 feet.

The committee went on to recommend that the FAA should continue to meet with the community leaders after new procedures are implemented to track how effective the changes have been, and should consider developing a new flight path that would take flights over less populated areas.

FMI: Full Report

Advertisement

More News

Classic Aero-TV: Extra; the Airplane, the Man, and His Grand DeLand Plan

From 2023 (YouTube Edition): Germany’s Best by Way of Florida Established in 1980 by German aerobatic pilot Walter Extra as a means by which to design and develop his own air>[...]

ANN FAQ: Follow Us On Instagram!

Get The Latest in Aviation News NOW on Instagram Are you on Instagram yet? It's been around for a few years, quietly picking up traction mostly thanks to everybody's new obsession >[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (11.27.25)

“Achieving PMA for the S-1200 Series magnetos is another step in expanding our commitment to providing the aviation community with the most trusted and durable ‘firewal>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (11.27.25): Ultralight Vehicle

Ultralight Vehicle A single-occupant aeronautical vehicle operated for sport or recreational purposes which does not require FAA registration, an airworthiness certificate, or pilo>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (11.27.25)

Aero Linx: The de Havilland Moth Club Ltd The de Havilland Moth Club evolved from a belief that an association of owners and operators of Moth aeroplanes should be formed to create>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC