Michigan Man Cleared of Drone Charges | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-11.24.25

AirborneNextGen-
11.18.25

Airborne-Unlimited-11.19.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-11.20.25

AirborneUnlimited-11.21.25

LIVE MOSAIC Town Hall (Archived): www.airborne-live.net

Thu, Jan 04, 2024

Michigan Man Cleared of Drone Charges

State Law Continues to Confound Regarding New Tech Applications

Charges against a 62-year old Michigan drone pilot have been dropped, after his lawyer tendered a copy of his Pilot certificate to the Oceana County Sheriff’s Office.

The story gained some local notoriety after news broke that the pilot, Donald Muckel, had been arrested for flying a drone over an electrical substation. Reports indicated he had done nothing eye-raising during his flight aside from operating in the vicinity within sight of someone nearby. The activity was called into the police by some onlooker, who provided video evidence to officers supposedly showing the incident. The local OCP officers assumed that it would fall under Michigan state law, 750.45a: That code states that it’s a crime to fly or hover an uncrewed aircraft in or above a key facility, which would include high-value elements of the power grid. Muckel was arraigned regarding the matter on November 17th. Things got more interesting in the case’s end, however, when the state dropped the charges altogether.

Muckel, following his arraignment, retained an attorney to serve as his interface with the police. The attorney provided a copy of Muckel’s pilot license, a turn that apparently surprised the responding officers on scene originally. They later said Muckel’s licensure was “never previously disclosed to us”, later confessing that “This office has not reviewed any similar cases prior to this one. Based on this information a warrant was issued.”

As it happens, the Michigan state law also includes a passage stating the statute preventing overflight does not apply to a commercial operator of an unmanned aircraft, so long as the aircraft is operated in compliance with FARs, authorizations, and exemptions. Muckel is a licensed Part 107 pilot, and an owner/operator of a local business providing drone photography. Under state law, Muckel was apparently in the clear. Overall, the incident serves as a small case study for drone operators in dotting their T’s and crossing their i’s - the paperwork cuts both ways.

FMI: www.oceana.mi.us

Advertisement

More News

Classic Aero-TV: Pure Aerial Precision - The Snowbirds at AirVenture 2016

From 2016 (YouTube Edition): The Canadian Forces Snowbirds Can Best Be Described As ‘Elegant’… EAA AirVenture 2016 was a great show and, in no small part, it was>[...]

NTSB Final Report: Costruzioni Aeronautiche Tecna P2012 Traveller

Airplane Lunged Forward When It Was Stuck From Behind By A Tug That Was Towing An Unoccupied Airliner Analysis: At the conclusion of the air taxi flight, the flight crew were taxii>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (11.23.25)

Aero Linx: International Stinson Club So you want to buy a Stinson. Well the Stinson is a GREAT value aircraft. The goal of the International Stinson Club is to preserve informatio>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (11.23.25): Request Full Route Clearance

Request Full Route Clearance Used by pilots to request that the entire route of flight be read verbatim in an ATC clearance. Such request should be made to preclude receiving an AT>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (11.23.25)

"Today's battlefield is adapting rapidly. By teaching our soldiers to understand how drones work and are built, we are giving them the skills to think creatively and apply emerging>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC