Gov't Says Boeing Overcharged On B-1B Decoy System | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-05.13.24

Airborne-NextGen-05.07.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.08.24 Airborne-FlightTraining-05.09.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.10.24

Wed, Sep 03, 2008

Gov't Says Boeing Overcharged On B-1B Decoy System

Sues Planemaker Under False Claims Act

The US government filed a federal lawsuit Tuesday against Boeing, saying the American planemaker and defense contractor deliberately inflated the price for a decoy system fitted to US Air Force B-1B Lancer bombers.

According to The Associated Press, the lawsuit claims the Air Force paid $7.5 million more than it should have, since Boeing was able to find a cheaper source for parts needed for the system... but failed to disclose that fact during contract negotiations, way back in 1990.

Specifically, the contract was based on Boeing's assertions it would manufacture parts for 57 decoy systems -- towed behind the bombers to thwart attacks from ground-based missiles and shoulder-fired rockets -- at a Boeing facility in Palmdale, CA. But the government says Boeing planned all along to close that plant, and obtain parts from a subcontractor at reduced cost.

Assistant US Attorney Lisa Palombo said had the USAF known of that change, it would have pushed for a lower price... and furthermore, that Boeing employees warned their managers to disclose the potential savings.

"It's a significant amount and, of course, it's all taxpayer money," she said. "We make it a priority to collect all taxpayer funds that are obtained through fraud. We don't make exceptions for anyone, individuals or large companies."

Company spokesman Forrest Gossett said Boeing believes it conducted its side of the negotiations in good faith, and that it fulfilled its contract.

The Air Force paid $36 million for the kits, according to the AP. Under the False Claims Act, the government may recover up to three times the amount it overpaid, on top of penalties.

FMI: www.af.mil, www.boeing.com

Advertisement

More News

Sierra Space Repositions Dream Chaser for First Mission

With Testing Soon Complete, Launch Preparations Begin in Earnest Sierra Space's Dream Chaser has been put through the wringer at NASA's Glenn Armstrong Test Facility in Ohio, but w>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.10.24): Takeoff Roll

Takeoff Roll The process whereby an aircraft is aligned with the runway centerline and the aircraft is moving with the intent to take off. For helicopters, this pertains to the act>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (05.10.24)

“We’re proud of the hard work that went into receiving this validation, and it will be a welcome relief to our customers in the European Union. We couldn’t be mor>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (05.11.24)

"Aircraft Spruce is pleased to announce the acquisition of the parts distribution operations of Wag-Aero. Wag-Aero was founded in the 1960’s by Dick and Bobbie Wagner in the >[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.11.24): IDENT Feature

IDENT Feature The special feature in the Air Traffic Control Radar Beacon System (ATCRBS) equipment. It is used to immediately distinguish one displayed beacon target from other be>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC