Sailors' Families File Complaint In 2007 Navy Helicopter Accident | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-11.24.25

AirborneNextGen-
11.18.25

Airborne-Unlimited-11.19.25

Airborne-AffordableFlyers-11.20.25

AirborneUnlimited-11.21.25

LIVE MOSAIC Town Hall (Archived): www.airborne-live.net

Mon, Jan 26, 2009

Sailors' Families File Complaint In 2007 Navy Helicopter Accident

MH-60S Suffered Tail Rotor Failure Off San Clemente Island

A California law firm has filed a Complaint in Los Angeles Superior Court on behalf of the families of three Navy sailors who died when their helicopter suffered an apparent tail rotor drive failure and went down in the Pacific Ocean during a training exercise two years ago.

The San Mateo-based firm of O'Reilly & Danko filed the Complaint on behalf of the spouses, families and relatives of Petty Officer First Class Cory Helman, Lt. Adam Dyer and Petty Officer 2nd Class Christopher H. Will. As ANN reported, the three sailors were killed when their MH-60S Knighthawk crashed during a training exercise off San Clemente Island on January 26, 2007.

Named as Defendants in the Complaint are the manufacturers of the Knighthawk, and of several of its components.

The Navy's Judge Advocate General Manual (JAGMAN) investigation found the reason for the crash to be "undetermined"... but, the law firm asserts, the JAGMAN's final report omitted one investigator's opinion that shortly before the pilot issued a "mayday" call the helicopter experienced a failure of the tail rotor drive system.

The crew members' survivors hired their own experts to look at the matter, the law firm adds, and asked that they be allowed to inspect the wreckage. The Navy initially indicated it would allow the inspection... but then made an about face and refused absent a court order.

"The Helmans, Dyers and Wills still have not received an answer to why the helicopter carrying their loved ones crashed into the Pacific," said their attorney, Michael S. Danko. "They just want to know what happened, and they want to make sure no other military families suffer the same losses they did on January 26, 2007."

FMI: www.oreillylaw.com/, www.navy.mil

Advertisement

More News

Classic Aero-TV: Pure Aerial Precision - The Snowbirds at AirVenture 2016

From 2016 (YouTube Edition): The Canadian Forces Snowbirds Can Best Be Described As ‘Elegant’… EAA AirVenture 2016 was a great show and, in no small part, it was>[...]

NTSB Final Report: Costruzioni Aeronautiche Tecna P2012 Traveller

Airplane Lunged Forward When It Was Stuck From Behind By A Tug That Was Towing An Unoccupied Airliner Analysis: At the conclusion of the air taxi flight, the flight crew were taxii>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (11.23.25)

Aero Linx: International Stinson Club So you want to buy a Stinson. Well the Stinson is a GREAT value aircraft. The goal of the International Stinson Club is to preserve informatio>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (11.23.25): Request Full Route Clearance

Request Full Route Clearance Used by pilots to request that the entire route of flight be read verbatim in an ATC clearance. Such request should be made to preclude receiving an AT>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (11.23.25)

"Today's battlefield is adapting rapidly. By teaching our soldiers to understand how drones work and are built, we are giving them the skills to think creatively and apply emerging>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2025 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC