FAA Facility Consolidation Plan Opposed In Pueblo | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-05.06.24

Airborne-NextGen-04.30.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.01.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers--05.02.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.03.24

Fri, Dec 01, 2006

FAA Facility Consolidation Plan Opposed In Pueblo

Lawmakers Want To Keep Approach Facility There Open

Colorado congressmen are opposing an FAA plan to close Pueblo's approach control facility and hand off control of air traffic to facilities in Colorado Springs or Denver.

The FAA announced the proposal in September, but has yet to make a final decision. The aviation agency is looking at consolidating operations in 170 facilities nationwide to save money.

Representative John Salazar says it's a safety issue. In a statement released Wednesday he said, "I have flown into the Pueblo airport many times and am concerned about the potential impact on air traffic safety if the proposal is approved."

A new pilot screening program awarded to Doss Aviation and set to take off at Pueblo is adding a wrinkle to the debate. Pueblo city officials say traffic handled by controllers will nearly double. The FAA says it can handle the increased traffic, even if Pueblo's approach control facility is closed.

Senators Ken Salazar and Wayne Allard have both contacted the FAA voicing their dissent to the plan. They say they'll fight against closing Pueblo's facility because they believe the increased traffic from the flight screening program will affect safety.

A Salazar spokesman told the Pueblo Chieftain, "Senator Salazar intends to keep that (approach control) service in Pueblo."

The National Air Traffic Controllers Association representative in Pueblo, Bryan Sanford, says Colorado Springs and Denver are already understaffed, and moving Pueblo's controllers to those facilities wouldn't save the FAA money.

As for Doss Aviation, company spokesman Paul Walker says, "We've taken a hands-off approach to this situation. As long as they can provide the service we need, we're willing to let the FAA determine where they want to locate the controllers."

FMI: www.faa.gov

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.09.24): Hold Procedure

Hold Procedure A predetermined maneuver which keeps aircraft within a specified airspace while awaiting further clearance from air traffic control. Also used during ground operatio>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.06.24): Altitude Readout

Altitude Readout An aircraft’s altitude, transmitted via the Mode C transponder feature, that is visually displayed in 100-foot increments on a radar scope having readout cap>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (05.06.24)

Aero Linx: European Hang Gliding and Paragliding Union (EHPU) The general aim of the EHPU is to promote and protect hang gliding and paragliding in Europe. In order to achieve this>[...]

Airborne-NextGen 05.07.24: AI-Piloted F-16, AgEagle, 1st 2 WorldView Sats

Also: Skydio Chief, Uncle Sam Sues, Dash 7 magniX, OR UAS Accelerator US Secretary of the Air Force Frank Kendall was given a turn around the patch in the 'X-62A Variable In-flight>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (05.07.24)

"The need for innovation at speed and scale is greater than ever. The X-62A VISTA is a crucial platform in our efforts to develop, test and integrate AI, as well as to establish AI>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC