Airport Neighbors: Don't Extend The Runway | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-05.06.24

Airborne-NextGen-05.07.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.08.24 Airborne-FlightTraining-05.09.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.10.24

Fri, Nov 19, 2004

Airport Neighbors: Don't Extend The Runway

Philadelphia International Gets An Earful About Noise

If you ask a lot of people around West Deptford Township (NJ), they don't want Philadelphia International's Runway 17-35 to be extended 400 feet in their direction -- they don't want the runway at all.

About 60 people, many of them township residents, showed up at a public hearing conducted by the FAA Tuesday night, opposed to the runway extension project. Specifically, two of the three alternatives under consideration would extend the runway south, toward the small New Jersey town. Residents say that would mean more pollution and more noise.

Steve Drummond not only doesn't want to see the runway extended toward his home in West Deptford. "I'd like to see 17-35 shut down entirely," he said. He was quoted in the Gloucester County Times.

Another resident hoping to add his displeasure to the testimony being gathered for the project's environmental impact statement was Judy Shillingford. "When the planes go over my house, it's deafening," she said. "I can't imagine what the quality of life will be in my neighborhood if this goes through."

Residents like Drummond and Shillingford have until the first of December to tell the FAA what they think about the idea of extending 17-35. The City of Philadelphia, which runs the airport, says it needs to extend the runway because of congestion.

Ironically, the FAA says not extending the runway could be even worse for the angry airport neighbors. They could see a "continued increase in aircraft noise from growth in airport operations," the report stated.

The federal EIS isn't the last stop for the proposed project. It still has to pass muster with the Pennsylvania Department of Environmental Protection, US Army Corps of Engineers and the US Environmental Protection Agency.

FMI: www.phl.org

Advertisement

More News

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (05.09.24)

"Fly-by-wire flight, coupled with additional capability that are being integrated into ALFA, provide a great foundation for Bell to expand on its autonomous capabilities. This airc>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.09.24): Hold Procedure

Hold Procedure A predetermined maneuver which keeps aircraft within a specified airspace while awaiting further clearance from air traffic control. Also used during ground operatio>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (05.09.24)

Aero Linx: B-21 Raider The B-21 Raider will be a dual-capable penetrating strike stealth bomber capable of delivering both conventional and nuclear munitions. The B-21 will form th>[...]

Airborne 05.03.24: Advanced Powerplant Solutions, PRA Runway Woes, Drone Racing

Also: Virgin Galactic, B-29 Doc to Allentown, Erickson Fire-Fighters Bought, FAA Reauthorization After dealing with a big letdown after the unexpected decision by Skyreach to disco>[...]

Airborne-NextGen 05.07.24: AI-Piloted F-16, AgEagle, 1st 2 WorldView Sats

Also: Skydio Chief, Uncle Sam Sues, Dash 7 magniX, OR UAS Accelerator US Secretary of the Air Force Frank Kendall was given a turn around the patch in the 'X-62A Variable In-flight>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC