Stimulus Sparks Debate Over O'Hare Expansion | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-05.06.24

Airborne-NextGen-05.07.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.08.24 Airborne-FlightTraining-05.09.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.10.24

Sun, Feb 08, 2009

Stimulus Sparks Debate Over O'Hare Expansion

Rep. Jackson Voices Opposition To Using Taxpayer Money For OMP

Congressman Jesse Jackson, Jr. (D-IL) spoke out Friday against Republican colleague Mark Kirk's comments in the Chicago Tribune suggesting that Illinois' share of the Stimulus Package be used to expand O'Hare. Rep. Kirk voted against the Stimulus Package that would bring $22 billion to Illinois and instead suggested that the government fully fund the $20 billion O'Hare Modernization Program.

"At a time when citizens all throughout our state are in desperate need of an economic life raft, Congressman Kirk's plan leaves our citizens stranded at O'Hare," said Rep. Jackson.

"The Stimulus Package approved by Congress would bring $22 billion to Illinois to modernize schools, repair roads, improve hospitals and put people to work. Congressman Kirk prefers giving that money to the O'Hare Modernization Program -- thus depriving children, seniors and needy people of vital services."

Rep. Jackson went on to say, "There is a better alternative for adding 100,000 flights per year to Illinois. O'Hare expansion will cost $20 billion. The proposed Abraham Lincoln National Airport would add the same number flights for a fraction of the cost -- about $500 million. And that money comes from private investors -- not taxpayers."

Work on the next phase of the O'Hare expansion has not begun and funding for the $20-billion Program has not been secured. Critics of the plan cite FAA studies, which show the expansion would not provide any significant improvement of airline delays or alleviate congestion at O'Hare.

Aviation experts say that OMP will instead produce massive delays and increase costs for both consumers and airlines during and after initial construction. In addition, the airlines, including United Airlines and American Airlines, have called the OMP plan "ill-conceived" and "premature."

FMI: www.ohare.com, www.stop-omp.org

Advertisement

More News

Airborne-Flight Training 05.09.24: ERAU at AIAA, LIFT Diamond Buy, Epic A&P

Also: Vertical Flight Society, NBAA Maintenance Conference, GA Honored, AMT Scholarship For the first time, students from Embry-Riddle’s Daytona Beach, Florida, campus took t>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.07.24): Hazardous Weather Information

Hazardous Weather Information Summary of significant meteorological information (SIGMET/WS), convective significant meteorological information (convective SIGMET/WST), urgent pilot>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (05.07.24)

"The need for innovation at speed and scale is greater than ever. The X-62A VISTA is a crucial platform in our efforts to develop, test and integrate AI, as well as to establish AI>[...]

NTSB Final Report: Cessna 150

(FAA) Inspector Observed That Both Fuel Tanks Were Intact And That Only A Minimal Amount Of Fuel Remained In Each Analysis: According to the pilot, approximately 8 miles from the d>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (05.08.24)

“Pyka’s Pelican Cargo is unlike any other UAS solution on the market for contested logistics. We assessed a number of leading capabilities and concluded that the Pelica>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC