NTSB Report Card: We Need A Better Report Card | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.29.24

Airborne-NextGen-04.30.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.01.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers--05.02.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.03.24

Thu, Jun 16, 2005

NTSB Report Card: We Need A Better Report Card

Says Current Methods Of Collecting And Reporting On GA Safety Issues Aren't Enough

The National Transportation Safety Board Wednesday released a safety report recommending that new methods be developed for collecting and reporting flight activity data for smaller, noncommercial (general aviation) airplanes.

The report was prompted by NTSB concerns about the accuracy and consistency of the procedures currently used by the Federal Aviation Administration in calculating how much and for what purpose people fly.

Unlike scheduled, commercial air carriers, general aviation operators are not required to report actual flight activity data.  Instead, the FAA uses its annual General Aviation and Air Taxi Activity (GAATA) Survey to query a sample of registered aircraft owners, either through the Internet or by mail.  Responses from the sampling are then extrapolated to the entire aircraft registry to obtain estimates of total activity.

The NTSB and others rely on this data to calculate accident rates and statistics that form the basis for assessing general aviation safety in the US.  Valid activity data are necessary to compare the accident rates for different aircraft types and types of operations, to establish baseline measures that can be used to identify and track accident trends, and to assess the effectiveness of safety improvement efforts.

However, the NTSB is concerned that the survey is based on a relatively small sample of diverse aircraft operations and that the aircraft registry may contain many outdated and inaccurate records.

The NTSB report discusses staff attempts to independently verify the accuracy of general aviation activity estimates by comparing FAA aircraft registry records and annual flight-hour estimates with other indicators of flight activity for the years 1985-2002, including the size of the active pilot population and annual aviation fuel consumption.  While the staff found strong statistical relationships among these various indicators, and with annual accident totals, they did not observe any significant correlations between the annual general aviation flight-hour estimates reported in the GAATA survey and the other activity indicators.

FMI: www.ntsb.gov

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (05.02.24)

Aero Linx: Model Aeronautical Association of Australia MAAA clubs are about fun flying, camaraderie and community. For over 75 years, the MAAA has been Australia’s largest fl>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.02.24): Touchdown Zone Lighting

Touchdown Zone Lighting Two rows of transverse light bars located symmetrically about the runway centerline normally at 100 foot intervals. The basic system extends 3,000 feet alon>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (05.02.24)

“Discovery and innovation are central to our mission at Virgin Galactic. We’re excited to build on our successful record of facilitating scientific experiments in subor>[...]

ANN FAQ: Contributing To Aero-TV

How To Get A Story On Aero-TV News/Feature Programming How do I submit a story idea or lead to Aero-TV? If you would like to submit a story idea or lead, please contact Jim Campbel>[...]

NTSB Final Report: Cirrus Design Corp SR20

Student Pilot Reported That During Rotation, “All Of A Sudden The Back Of The Plane Kicked To The Right..." Analysis: The student pilot reported that during rotation, “>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC