Canadian Twin Otter Crash Report Released | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.29.24

Airborne-NextGen-04.30.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.01.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers--05.02.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.03.24

Tue, Nov 29, 2022

Canadian Twin Otter Crash Report Released

Another Incident, Another Lesson in Checklist Adherence

Canada's Transportation Safety Board has published a safety investigation report regarding a 2021 incident involving an Air Tindi Twin Otter that went down due to fuel starvation. 

The de Havilland DHC-6-300, C-GNPS, left Yellowknife Airport in the Northwest Territories on a VFR flight to Fort Simpson Airport. The flight carried 2 pilots and 3 passengers. The flight proceeded as normal until crews noticed an insufficient fuel state to complete the planned flight. Worse, they realized that 40 minutes of flight had put them outside range of Yellowknife, resulting in a diversion to Fort Providence Aerodrome. While en route, the crew informed the Air Tindi of their plans and shut down the left engine in an effort to limit fuel consumption. In classic Murphian form, the right engine soon flamed out.

The crew completed a forced landing onto Muskeg, with an ELT signal successfully transmitted to the Canadian Mission Control Centre shortly after. The landing was made late in the evening around 1900 hrs about 7 nm northwest of their planned airfield, exposing passengers to the elements until recovery by authorities. The Twin Otter is said to have sustained "substantial damage."

The cause of the incident comes down to a procedural issue and a breakdown of communication. The investigation showed that Air Tindi personnel usually informed flight coordinators of how much fuel was required for their next flight, which was then petitioned from personnel at the field. For the incident flight, investigators could not find whether or not the flight crew had requested fuel from the coordinator, while a fuel order was not placed, too. Like any accident chain, the clues add up in retrospect - The busy crew continued as per the usual routine, while the caption incorrectly assumed a fuel receipt sticking out of the map pocket indicated a fresh load of 2,500 lbs of fuel. The crew remained occupied with starting the aircraft until passengers boarded, when the captain interrupted his flow to speak with a former Air Tindi employee coming aboard. With his rhythm broken, the captain completed a series of checklist items from memory, with everything from After Start to Cruise completed without referencing paper checklists. 

The Board notes that at this point in the incident, a disciplined crew (which we all are...in theory) should have checked the Otter's fuel quantity at least 3 times. Around this time, as the aircraft flew at a cruise altitude of 6,500 ft, the fuel company inquired as to whether or not the outbound flight required a fuel-up only to be told the plane was already en route. At that time the low-fuel caution light illuminated, with approximately 60 gallons of fuel on board. The plane had only 40 minutes of flight time remaining, even with all 17 gallons of aux fuel counted. After attempting to divert and conserve fuel, the crew was forced to pitch for best glide and set the plane down in a non-wooded, marshy location in the Muskeg. The aircraft remained upright throughout the landing, with all aboard waiting 4 hours for rescue to pick them up. Thankfully, aside from minor hypothermia ailed those involved in the incident. 

Overall, the report portrays a cautionary tale for pilots, warning against ever-present complacency. Like so many pieces involving a fuel starvation issue, the ingredient list is familiar: Pilots with somewhere to be, an unspoken assumption of tasks completed, insufficient adherence to checklist items, and lackadaisical cockpit procedures. All are unfortunately common items on flight decks every day of the year, making this event another sobering reminder to maintain discipline, communicate, and use the checklist - even though sometimes that's easier said than done. 

FMI: www.tsb.gc.ca

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.02.24): Touchdown Zone Lighting

Touchdown Zone Lighting Two rows of transverse light bars located symmetrically about the runway centerline normally at 100 foot intervals. The basic system extends 3,000 feet alon>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (05.02.24)

“Discovery and innovation are central to our mission at Virgin Galactic. We’re excited to build on our successful record of facilitating scientific experiments in subor>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (05.03.24)

"We are reaching out to you today on behalf of the Popular Rotorcraft Association because we need your help. We are dangerously close to losing a critical resource that if lost, wi>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.03.24): UAS Traffic Management (UTM)

UAS Traffic Management (UTM) The unmanned aircraft traffic management ecosystem that will allow multiple low altitude BVLOS operations and which is separate from, but complementary>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (05.03.24)

Aero Linx: Society of Aviation and Flight Educators (SAFE) SAFE is a member-oriented organization of aviation educators fostering professionalism and excellence in aviation through>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC