Boeing, Spirit, Ask Judge To Dismiss Age Discrimination Suit | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.29.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.23.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.24.24 Airborne-FltTraining-04.25.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.26.24

Thu, Aug 06, 2009

Boeing, Spirit, Ask Judge To Dismiss Age Discrimination Suit

Companies Say Suit Has No Merit, Filed Late

Boeing and Spirit Aerosystems have filed papers asking a federal judge to not grant class-action status in a suit brought by former Boeing employees who lost their jobs when Spirit bought Boeing facilities in Kansas and Oklahoma in 2005. The workers claim Spirit, which was formed by its parent company Onex Corporation of Canada after the sale, did not re-hire some Boeing workers because of their age, denying them pension benefits.

According to the Associated Press, Boeing and Spirit have filed over 900 pages of documents supporting their claim that Spirit had legitimate reasons for not re-hiring some employees. The case is being considered in U.S. District Court in Wichita.

In the court papers, the companies claim that Spirit had a need for its workforce to "be flexible and possess the skills and attitude necessary to give the new venture the best chance of success." They also say the lawsuit was not filed on time.

The former workers, for their part, cite internal memos suggesting that Spirit cut older workers, generally between the ages of 45 and 54, in a "selective re-hire" process. Workers in that age group reportedly were considered the most expensive to retain.

Boeing and Spirit counter with an argument that 85 percent of the workforce over age 40 was recommended for re-hire. About 90 former employees have filed the suit, seeking reinstatement to their positions and $1.5 billion in punitive damages, well as unspecified compensatory damages.

FMI: www.ksd.uscourts.gov

Advertisement

More News

Unfortunate... ANN/SportPlane Resource Guide Adds To Cautionary Advisories

The Industry Continues to be Rocked By Some Questionable Operations Recent investigations and a great deal of data has resulted in ANN’s SportPlane Resource Guide’s rep>[...]

ANN FAQ: Turn On Post Notifications

Make Sure You NEVER Miss A New Story From Aero-News Network Do you ever feel like you never see posts from a certain person or page on Facebook or Instagram? Here’s how you c>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.29.24): Visual Approach Slope Indicator (VASI)

Visual Approach Slope Indicator (VASI) An airport lighting facility providing vertical visual approach slope guidance to aircraft during approach to landing by radiating a directio>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.28.24): Airport Marking Aids

Airport Marking Aids Markings used on runway and taxiway surfaces to identify a specific runway, a runway threshold, a centerline, a hold line, etc. A runway should be marked in ac>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.28.24)

Aero Linx: The Skyhawk Association The Skyhawk Association is a non-profit organization founded by former Skyhawk Pilots which is open to anyone with an affinity for the A-4 Skyhaw>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC