Boeing Blames Pilots For Asiana Flight 214 Accident | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-04.22.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.16.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-04.17.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers-04.18.24

Airborne-Unlimited-04.19.24

Join Us At 0900ET, Friday, 4/10, for the LIVE Morning Brief.
Watch It LIVE at
www.airborne-live.net

Mon, Apr 07, 2014

Boeing Blames Pilots For Asiana Flight 214 Accident

The NTSB Investigation Continues, Boeing And Asiana Submit Their Opinions To The Board

All of us in aviation were stunned by the accident involving a Boeing 777 operating as  Asiana flight 214 in San Francisco in June of last year. It was clearly a case of a well proven airplane being flown by an airline trained crew flying in a controlled manner, yet they landing short of the runway by about one third of a mile. Added to this scenario is the fact that it was a visual approach and weather was obviously not a factor.

The NTSB has not issued its final report on this accident but it seems the key aspects of the investigation are aimed at two issues. Was it a case of pilot error or was there something in the auto-flight system that caused the accident?

According to a recent article published by the Seattle Times newspaper, Boeing lays the blame directly on the flight crew. The article stated that a Boeing document sent to the NTSB said that the accident, “… would have been avoided had the flight crew followed procedures.” The Boeing document continued, “This accident occurred due to the flight crew’s failure to monitor and control airspeed, thrust level and glide path.”

The article continues to say that the South Korean airline agrees to some extent with what Boeing says. However, Asiana also faulted the logic of the auto throttle system and the lack of adequate cockpit warnings that the airspeed was below safe limits.

While the NTSB continues to investigate and digest gained information, the FAA has already taken action to increase awareness of U.S. airlines for the need to address basic piloting skills in their training programs.

(Image provided by NTSB)

FMI: www.ntsb.gov

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (04.24.24): Runway Lead-in Light System

Runway Lead-in Light System Runway Lead-in Light System Consists of one or more series of flashing lights installed at or near ground level that provides positive visual guidance a>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (04.24.24)

Aero Linx: Aviation Without Borders Aviation Without Borders uses its aviation expertise, contacts and partnerships to enable support for children and their families – at hom>[...]

Aero-FAQ: Dave Juwel's Aviation Marketing Stories -- ITBOA BNITBOB

Dave Juwel's Aviation Marketing Stories ITBOA BNITBOB ... what does that mean? It's not gibberish, it's a lengthy acronym for "In The Business Of Aviation ... But Not In The Busine>[...]

Classic Aero-TV: Best Seat in The House -- 'Inside' The AeroShell Aerobatic Team

From 2010 (YouTube Version): Yeah.... This IS A Really Cool Job When ANN's Nathan Cremisino took over the lead of our Aero-TV teams, he knew he was in for some extra work and a lot>[...]

Airborne Affordable Flyers 04.18.24: CarbonCub UL, Fisher, Affordable Flyer Expo

Also: Junkers A50 Heritage, Montaer Grows, Dynon-Advance Flight Systems, Vans' Latest Officially, the Carbon Cub UL and Rotax 916 iS is now in its 'market survey development phase'>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC