Report: B-52 Crew Transported Nuke Weapons Over US Soil | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-05.06.24

Airborne-NextGen-04.30.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.01.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers--05.02.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.03.24

Wed, Sep 05, 2007

Report: B-52 Crew Transported Nuke Weapons Over US Soil

Someone Screwed Up...

Heads are going to roll. That's the opinion of one military analyst, after learning a B-52 crew inadvertantly transported six nuclear warheads from North Dakota to Louisiana last week, breaching several US Air Force and international regulations on the transport of such weapons.

Citing an original report by the Army Times, CNN reports the bomber took the missiles from Minot AFB to Barksdale AFB for decomissioning Thursday. The plane flew over several US states, with the cruise missiles carried on underwing pylons.

While the Air Force doesn't usually comment on its procedures for transporting such weapons, USAF officials told CNN the incident was a significant breach of security...  while also taking pains to reassure citizens the situation sounds a lot scarier than it actually was.

"The public was never in any danger," Lt. Col. Ed Thomas said.

That may be true, acknowledged retired USAF major general Don Shepperd... but the incident is still  alarming.

"This is a major gaffe, and it's going to cause some heads to roll down the line," said Shepperd, who now works as a military analyst for CNN. Sheppard went on to say the incident would appear to violate a Cold War-era treaty banning the aerial transport of nuclear weapons.

The plane's crew was apparently unaware the missiles were nuclear-ready. The warheads were not armed, and officials say had the aircraft crashed or the missiles become detached from the wings, they would have remained inert.

Sheppard says it's true the weapons likely would not have triggered a nuclear blast in those scenarios... but that's still small comfort. "Any time you have nuclear material on board, if the airplane crashes, nuclear material can be spread in the immediate area of the crash, so you get radioactivity in the immediate area of the crash," he said.

"This is serious business but it was not dangerous business."

As the incident involved nuclear warheads, President Bush was also notified of the error.

FMI: www.af.mil

Advertisement

More News

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.05.24): Omnidirectional Approach Lighting System

Omnidirectional Approach Lighting System ODALS consists of seven omnidirectional flashing lights located in the approach area of a nonprecision runway. Five lights are located on t>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (05.05.24)

"Polaris Dawn, the first of the program’s three human spaceflight missions, is targeted to launch to orbit no earlier than summer 2024. During the five-day mission, the crew >[...]

Airborne 05.06.24: Gone West-Dick Rutan, ICON BK Update, SpaceX EVA Suit

Also: 1800th E-Jet, Uncle Sam Sues For Landing Gear, Embraer Ag Plane, Textron Parts A friend of the family reported that Lt. Col. (Ret.) Richard Glenn Rutan flew west on Friday, M>[...]

Airborne 05.03.24: Advanced Powerplant Solutions, PRA Runway Woes, Drone Racing

Also: Virgin Galactic, B-29 Doc to Allentown, Erickson Fire-Fighters Bought, FAA Reauthorization After dealing with a big letdown after the unexpected decision by Skyreach to disco>[...]

Aero-News: Quote of the Day (05.06xx.24)

“Our aircrews are trained and capable of rapidly shifting from operational missions to humanitarian roles. We planned to demonstrate how we, and our BORSTAR partners, respond>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC