Tue, Dec 06, 2011
HAI President Part Of NTSB Forum Held Last Week
The line between public use and civil aviation operations is
currently so blurred, especially for contract operators, that the
time has come to bring all the stakeholders together as a working
group to provide clarity on the issue. That was the message HAI
President Matt Zuccaro brought to the NTSB at its forum on public
use aviation safety.
(L-R) Zuccaro, NTSB Chair Hersman
Public use missions are flown for the public good by
government-owned or government-contracted aircraft. Some of the
better-known public missions include law enforcement, aerial
firefighting, search and rescue, and military.
For contract operators, especially, knowing which flights flown for
a government agency come under FAA jurisdiction and which are
public use and therefore outside of FAA oversight, is problematic.
But Zuccaro told the Board members that types of missions that
could not be accomplished under the FAA’s civil regulations
are few. He suggested that stakeholders gathered into a working
group should be able to narrowly define those missions and provide
recommendations about when an operator needs to declare that a
mission is public use and therefore beyond FAA oversight.
During testimony on another of the forum’s seven panels, HAI
Chairman of the Board Mark Gibson reiterated that point, telling
the board that many, if not most, of the operations that his
company, Timberland Logging, flies for government agencies, could
be flown under civil authorization. By law, public use aviation
missions are not considered part of civil aviation and therefore
not under the purview of the Federal Aviation Administration or
subject to most federal aviation regulations.
Under the FAA’s interpretation of the law, the government
agency operating or contracting for a public use mission assumes
the legal responsibility for the safe operation and maintenance of
that aircraft. Yet time and again over the course of the two-day
forum, agencies and contract operators alike said they operate
within the federal aviation regulations with only a few exceptions,
such as transporting hazardous materials or carrying Class D
external loads.
Zuccaro told the Board members that he feels strongly about the
need for a working group, and that if asked, would be willing to
sponsor the group.
More News
Runway Lead-in Light System Runway Lead-in Light System Consists of one or more series of flashing lights installed at or near ground level that provides positive visual guidance a>[...]
Aero Linx: Aviation Without Borders Aviation Without Borders uses its aviation expertise, contacts and partnerships to enable support for children and their families – at hom>[...]
Dave Juwel's Aviation Marketing Stories ITBOA BNITBOB ... what does that mean? It's not gibberish, it's a lengthy acronym for "In The Business Of Aviation ... But Not In The Busine>[...]
From 2010 (YouTube Version): Yeah.... This IS A Really Cool Job When ANN's Nathan Cremisino took over the lead of our Aero-TV teams, he knew he was in for some extra work and a lot>[...]
Also: Junkers A50 Heritage, Montaer Grows, Dynon-Advance Flight Systems, Vans' Latest Officially, the Carbon Cub UL and Rotax 916 iS is now in its 'market survey development phase'>[...]