Investigators Cite Faulty Altimeter As Factor In Amsterdam Accident | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-05.20.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.28.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-05.29.24 Airborne-Unlimited-05.30.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.24.24

Wed, Mar 04, 2009

Investigators Cite Faulty Altimeter As Factor In Amsterdam Accident

Instrument Showed Plane Near Ground, Was Actually About 2,000 Feet Above

Dutch investigators believe an erroneous altimeter indication played a role in last week's downing of a Turkish Airlines Boeing 737-800 near Amsterdam's Schiphol Airport.

According to the BBC, Dutch Safety Board chairman Pieter van Vollenhoven told reporters the aircraft's autopilot was flying the approach to Schiphol. Investigators believe a problem with the altimeter led to a loss of airspeed, which in turn caused an approach stall.

Van Vollenhoven said the plane's altimeter showed the aircraft at ground level, when it was actually about 1,950 feet above. The autopilot, responding to the altimeter reading, throttled back the plane's engines in preparation for the landing flare and touchdown.

"The crew initially did not react to these events," van Vollenhoven said. When a condition warning sounded, he added, the crew attempted to throttle the engines back up.

"But the plane was too low at 150 meters," he said. "As a consequence the plane crashed 1 kilometer before the runway."

The Associated Press adds investigators also found the flight crew had noticed an error with the altimeter, but did not consider it to be a problem. Boeing had previously issued a warning about potential problems with the altimeters.

As ANN reported, nine people onboard were killed when the aircraft impacted a field short of the runway at Schiphol. The aircraft hit the ground tail first, and broke into three pieces from the force of the impact.

Fatalities included the captain and two other members of the flight crew. Dozens of the 127 people onboard were severely injured in the February 23 crash.

Investigators also noted a report by Turkish Airlines, stating the plane had been taken out of service two days before the accident due to problems with the aircraft's Master Caution Light program. Dutch authorities do not believe that problem was causal to the accident, however.

FMI: www.safetyboard.nl, www.ntsb.gov, www.thy.com

Advertisement

More News

ANN FAQ: Contributing To Aero-TV

How To Get A Story On Aero-TV News/Feature Programming How do I submit a story idea or lead to Aero-TV? If you would like to submit a story idea or lead, please contact Jim Campbel>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (05.29.24)

Aero Linx: International Association of Professional Gyroplane Training (IAPGT) We are an Association of people who fly, build or regulate Gyroplanes, who have a dream of a single >[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.29.24): NORDO (No Radio)

NORDO (No Radio) Aircraft that cannot or do not communicate by radio when radio communication is required are referred to as “NORDO.”>[...]

Airborne 05.28.24: Jump Plane Down, Starship's 4th, Vision Jet Problems

Also: uAvionix AV-Link, F-16 Viper Demo, TN National Guard, 'Staff the Towers' A Saturday afternoon jump run, originating from SkyDive Kansas City, went bad when it was reported th>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.30.24): Beyond Visual Line Of Sight (BVLOS)

Beyond Visual Line Of Sight (BVLOS) The operation of a UAS beyond the visual capability of the flight crew members (i.e., remote pilot in command [RPIC], the person manipulating th>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC