FAA Issues Warning On Expense Sharing for Pilots | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-05.20.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.28.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-05.29.24 Airborne-Unlimited-05.30.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.24.24

Fri, Feb 04, 2022

FAA Issues Warning On Expense Sharing for Pilots

Continuing Crackdown on Illegal Operations Puts Flight Sharing, Time Sharing, Leasing in Sights

In a follow on to a May 2020 informational pilot letter, amid a continuing operation to address unlawful and illegal air charter operations, the FAA has published its infographic for use at airports throughout the airport system. 

The FAA reminds those who could be at risk of incorrectly applying expense sharing that guidance is available in Advisory Circular 61-142. The vintage bugbear of "holding out" has been brought back to life, newly invigorated by the societal shifts of ubiquitous smartphones. As automotive ridesharing platforms have transformed metropolitan transit systems, many operators and owners of light aircraft have looked on with jealousy at the ease of monetization and cost recoupment available to their terrestrial counterparts. A few attempts have been made to bring the same smartphone-level convenience to aviation, but difficulties in staying compliant have continued to make them untenable. 
 
Alongside AC-61-142, the FAA takes note of AC 120-12A, which reminds pilots of the "common purpose test," i.e.,the rationale for a shared-cost ride must be something other than passenger carriage in order for a pilot using their private privileges in order to carry passengers. Carrying strangers for the sake of gaining time or to its own end, as many have found, is a good way to invoke the curiosity of a local inspector, made all the more probable with loose-lipped internet braggarts proud of their cool new travel arrangements. The admin reminds even professional pilots holding ATP or Commercial certificates that their induction into the paid-pilot club does not automatically anoint all their operations with regulatory compliance under the FARs. Reportedly, even well-experienced pilots often forget that while they themselves may be qualified in accordance with the applicable part 61 privileges and limitations, but the flight itself may be conducted under an operating rule as a part 91 or 135 flight.

Professional level pilots are also reminded by the FAA that they cannot hold out to the public unless they have been issued a part 119 certificate. 

These issues are not new to the industry by any means, only re-energized. "Unauthorized 135 operations continue to be a problem nationwide, putting the flying public in danger, diluting safety in the national airspace system, and undercutting the business of legitimate operators," said the administration in its newsletter. The administration identifies two main pillars of misunderstanding remain "the misuse and/or misunderstanding of expense sharing between pilots and passengers, and the apparent lack of understanding of pilot privileges and limitations versus operating rules." The issue won’t disappear any time soon, but at the very least, those in the industry can remain wary of slip ups in their own operations. 

FMI: www.avoidillegalcharter.com

Advertisement

More News

ANN FAQ: Contributing To Aero-TV

How To Get A Story On Aero-TV News/Feature Programming How do I submit a story idea or lead to Aero-TV? If you would like to submit a story idea or lead, please contact Jim Campbel>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (05.29.24)

Aero Linx: International Association of Professional Gyroplane Training (IAPGT) We are an Association of people who fly, build or regulate Gyroplanes, who have a dream of a single >[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.29.24): NORDO (No Radio)

NORDO (No Radio) Aircraft that cannot or do not communicate by radio when radio communication is required are referred to as “NORDO.”>[...]

Airborne 05.28.24: Jump Plane Down, Starship's 4th, Vision Jet Problems

Also: uAvionix AV-Link, F-16 Viper Demo, TN National Guard, 'Staff the Towers' A Saturday afternoon jump run, originating from SkyDive Kansas City, went bad when it was reported th>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.30.24): Beyond Visual Line Of Sight (BVLOS)

Beyond Visual Line Of Sight (BVLOS) The operation of a UAS beyond the visual capability of the flight crew members (i.e., remote pilot in command [RPIC], the person manipulating th>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC