Collings Foundation Solicits Comments On FAA LHFE Proposal | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-05.20.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.28.24

Airborne-FlightTraining-05.29.24 Airborne-Unlimited-05.30.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.24.24

Wed, Jun 13, 2012

Collings Foundation Solicits Comments On FAA LHFE Proposal

NPRM Could Severely Restrict Living History Flight Experiences

In 1996, the FAA granted an exemption from various requirements of part 91 and part 119 to the Collings Foundation to operate a B-17 and B-24 World War II bomber carrying passengers for the purpose of preserving U.S. military aviation history. In return for donations, the contributors would receive a local flight in the restored bomber. The Living History Flight Experience (LHFE) was created. Since then, over 100,000 people have had the opportunity to experience Aviation History firsthand through a flight in several American historic treasures. Many passengers are veterans and their families. It would be a national travesty not to be able to make aircraft like the Skyraider, F-100, Me 262 and other WWII aircraft accessible to the public for flight experiences and living history events.

Over time, other organizations have applied for similar exemptions and in 2006, the FAA published a formal policy and set of rules for the Living History Flight Experience Exemption process. All of the groups operating under the LHFE program operate to honor our Nation’s veterans and educate our younger generations as to the sacrifice that these heroes made for our freedom. It is important to note that there has not been one accident, fatality or serious injury during an LHFE flight.

On March 23, 2011, the FAA placed a Moratorium on new applications for the Living History Flight Experience, and is currently soliciting public comment on the 2006 rule. In particular, the FAA’s questions concern General LHFE Policy, Issuance and Limitations, Weather Minimums, Pilot Qualifications, and Maintenance and Inspections.

The Collings Foundation is asking everyone to familiarize themselves with LHFE, the proposed exemption questions and the Collings response, and then formally respond to the FAA at the official regulations.gov website. Responses must be posted before 06/18/2012.

Currently, aircraft that have a LHFE exemption are also at risk as there is no guarantee from the FAA that these letters will be renewed (especially considering recent actions taken by the FAA). The FAA has proposed a rule change involving the LHFE. The issues that the FAA have brought forward are virtually the same issues that has already been addressed at a conference in Oshkosh ten years ago at a meeting chaired by Director of Flight Standards, John Allen.

Examples of the FAA and DoD hostility include the LHFE exemption program moratorium, the recent change of how the airworthiness certificates for former military jet aircraft are issued and the attempt to modify the Title 10 Section 2571 to prohibit any transfer of Government aircraft or parts for any purpose other than static display (see April's eNewsletter regarding Congressman Michael Turner). We are certain that changes in the LHFE program are just another way to limit warbird operation.

The FAA is hosting a public meeting to discuss LHFE in Washington DC, June 26th through June 28th. The FAA is looking for input from the public. If you would like to see historic aircraft continue to fly in honor of our Veterans and be able to experience flying in these aircraft your support is needed. Tell the FAA and your local representative to leave the existing LHFE alone. This policy should be expanded, not contracted. It is important to present a cohesive front to the FAA before the rules become more draconian.

The Collings Foundation suggests the following talking points when communication with the FAA:
Leave the current LHFE policy alone.

  • Allow operators to offer aerobatic flight.
  • Allow operators to let the passenger manipulate the flight controls.
  • Allow "replica" aircraft like the Me-262 to receive an LHFE exemption.
  • Remove the unnecessary provision that forces us to have arrestor gear for the F-4 and TA-4
  • End the unnecessary moratorium immediately and process the Collings Foundation's requests as expeditiously as possible.

All comments have to be received by June 18th.

FMI: www.faa.gov, Submit Comments
 

Advertisement

More News

ANN FAQ: Contributing To Aero-TV

How To Get A Story On Aero-TV News/Feature Programming How do I submit a story idea or lead to Aero-TV? If you would like to submit a story idea or lead, please contact Jim Campbel>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Linx (05.29.24)

Aero Linx: International Association of Professional Gyroplane Training (IAPGT) We are an Association of people who fly, build or regulate Gyroplanes, who have a dream of a single >[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.29.24): NORDO (No Radio)

NORDO (No Radio) Aircraft that cannot or do not communicate by radio when radio communication is required are referred to as “NORDO.”>[...]

Airborne 05.28.24: Jump Plane Down, Starship's 4th, Vision Jet Problems

Also: uAvionix AV-Link, F-16 Viper Demo, TN National Guard, 'Staff the Towers' A Saturday afternoon jump run, originating from SkyDive Kansas City, went bad when it was reported th>[...]

ANN's Daily Aero-Term (05.30.24): Beyond Visual Line Of Sight (BVLOS)

Beyond Visual Line Of Sight (BVLOS) The operation of a UAS beyond the visual capability of the flight crew members (i.e., remote pilot in command [RPIC], the person manipulating th>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC