Massachusetts Considers Reinstatement Tax On Airplane Sales, Parts | Aero-News Network
Aero-News Network
RSS icon RSS feed
podcast icon MP3 podcast
Subscribe Aero-News e-mail Newsletter Subscribe

Airborne Unlimited -- Most Recent Daily Episodes

Episode Date

Airborne-Monday

Airborne-Tuesday

Airborne-Wednesday Airborne-Thursday

Airborne-Friday

Airborne On YouTube

Airborne-Unlimited-05.13.24

Airborne-NextGen-05.14.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.15.24 Airborne-AffordableFlyers-05.16.24

Airborne-Unlimited-05.17.24

Thu, Aug 27, 2015

Massachusetts Considers Reinstatement Tax On Airplane Sales, Parts

Tax Was Abolished In 2002

The Massachusetts legislature is considering reinstating a 6.25 percent sales tax on airplane sales, parts, and maintenance that was abolished in 2002.

Some in the current legislature are calling the tax break a "giveaway for wealthy executives with corporate jets." But the aviation industry counters that bringing back the tax would drive business to other states, and small airports would be the hardest hit.

The Gloucester Times reports that former Governor Deval Patrick had tried to reinstate the tax during the recession, but the proposal did not gain traction in the Democrat-controlled legislature. And even if the current legislature is successful in passing the tax, it could be vetoed by current Governor Charlie Baker (pictured), a Republican.

Baker spokesman Billy Pitman said the Governor does not support increasing taxes on businesses in the state, but he would "review any legislation that should it reach his desk."

Dave Dinneen, president of the Massachusetts Airport Management Association, said that the industry is supportive of spending money on education, but it should not be taken at the expense of a growing sector that supports 124,000 jobs statewide and has an $11.9 billion economic impact on the state.

While Rep. Cory Atkins, (D-Concord) said he "can't understand why this exemption has survived so long" because it is a " generous tax break for the rich, while we’re cutting every year to balance the budget," Sen. Barbara L’Italien, (D-Andover), however, said that there is a strong argument for keeping the exemption, particularly for airports near the border with states that do not charge a tax. “These airports must compete with other states for business, so we need to give them whatever competitive advantage we can,” she said. “They provide a vital service for us, and we need them to stay open.”

FMI: https://malegislature.gov

Advertisement

More News

Bolen Gives Congress a Rare Thumbs-Up

Aviation Governance Secured...At Least For a While The National Business Aviation Association similarly applauded the passage of the FAA's recent reauthorization, contentedly recou>[...]

The SportPlane Resource Guide RETURNS!!!!

Emphasis On Growing The Future of Aviation Through Concentration on 'AFFORDABLE FLYERS' It's been a number of years since the Latest Edition of Jim Campbell's HUGE SportPlane Resou>[...]

Buying Sprees Continue: Textron eAviation Takes On Amazilia Aerospace

Amazilia Aerospace GmbH, Develops Digital Flight Control, Flight Guidance And Vehicle Management Systems Textron eAviation has acquired substantially all the assets of Amazilia Aer>[...]

Hawker 4000 Bizjets Gain Nav System, Data Link STC

Honeywell's Primus Brings New Tools and Niceties for Hawker Operators Hawker 4000 business jet operators have a new installation on the table, now that the FAA has granted an STC f>[...]

Echodyne Gets BVLOS Waiver for AiRanger Aircraft

Company Celebrates Niche-but-Important Advancement in Industry Standards Echodyne has announced full integration of its proprietary 'EchoFlight' radar into the e American Aerospace>[...]

blog comments powered by Disqus



Advertisement

Advertisement

Podcasts

Advertisement

© 2007 - 2024 Web Development & Design by Pauli Systems, LC